Commonwealth of Kentucky v. David Goodson

Lexington, Kentucky criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with assault with a dangerous weapon.



On the evening of December 28, 2020, Lexington Police Officers Ryan Nichols and Brent Bereznak were on duty when they received a call from dispatch regarding shots fired near an apartment complex on Tates Creek Road. The officers were already in the area and heard the gun shots, so they proceeded to a nearby intersection to wait for what they believed to be the suspected shooter's vehicle, a Ford Mustang. The officers soon spotted the vehicle, which was riddled with bullet holes and had flat tires. The officers initiated a traffic stop and discovered that the three female occupants of the vehicle were the victims of the shooting.



* *N *



David Goodson entered a conditional guilty plea pursuant to North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25 (1970).



* * *



Legal issue Were the identification procedures used by law enforcement unduly suggestive, and did the trial court err in denying a continuance to locate a material witness?

Headnote



CRIMINAL PROCEDURE. MOTION TO SUPPRESS IDENTIFICATION. The appeal addressed whether the trial court erred in denying a motion to suppress victims' identifications of the appellant as the shooter, arguing the identification procedure was unduly suggestive and violated due process rights.



CRIMINAL PROCEDURE. MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE. The case assessed the trial court's refusal to grant a continuance for locating a witness, evaluating whether the denial constituted an abuse of discretion resulting in a manifest injustice for the defendant.



Key Phrases Conditional guilty plea. Motion to suppress identification. Potential witness. Suggestive identification procedure. Abuse of discretion.

Affirmed