Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
United States ex rel. Perlstein v. Tabb Textiles Co., Inc., et al.
Date: 02-10-2023
Case Number: 21-CV-70
Judge: Not Available
Court: United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky (Urban County)
Plaintiff's Attorney: United States Attorney’s Office in Lexington
Defendant's Attorney:
Federal Prison Industries, Inc., also known as "UNICOR,†is a corporation wholly owned by the United States that allows inmates of the Bureau of Prisons to obtain occupational skills and work experience prior to their release. UNICOR's operations include the manufacturing of apparel and other textile goods at twenty-three locations across the United States. Through these operations, UNICOR also strives to support the domestic economy, acquiring its manufacturing supplies from American companies.
On April 1, 2016, UNICOR awarded Tabb a contract for the provision of domestic fabric for use in UNICOR's textile operations. Under the contract, Tabb supplied over six million yards of fabric to UNICOR. Of these six million yards of fabric, approximately 200,000 yards of fabric came from a foreign source, an error that arose from Tabb intermingling foreign and domestic fabric after the bleaching process.
A qui tam complaint prompted the United States's investigation. A qui tam is a lawsuit under the False Claims Act that is brought by a private citizen on behalf of the United States, allowing the private citizen to share in the financial recovery. Although the investigation demonstrated that Tabb purchased domestic fabric for the contract, an internal investigation by Tabb revealed the intermingling of foreign and domestic white fabric, causing UNICOR to accept delivery of foreign-sourced fabric. Tabb cooperated with the United States' inquiries, disclosing the results of its internal investigation and agreeing to compensate the United States for its error. The private citizen who brought the qui tam suit will receive approximately $65,000 from the settlement.
The case was investigated by the U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Inspector General. Assistant United States Attorney Mary Melton represented for the United States.
About This Case
Which court heard United States ex rel. Perlstein v. Tabb Textiles Co., Inc...?
This case was heard in United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky (Urban County), KY. The presiding judge was Not Available.
Who were the attorneys in United States ex rel. Perlstein v. Tabb Textiles Co., Inc...?
Plaintiff's attorney: United States Attorney’s Office in Lexington. Defendant's attorney: Click Here to Watch How To Find A Lawyer by Kent Morlan Click Here For The Best Lexington Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory If no lawyer is listed, call 918-582-6422 and MoreLaw will help you find a lawyer..
When was United States ex rel. Perlstein v. Tabb Textiles Co., Inc... decided?
This case was decided on February 10, 2023.