Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

MARTIN MENDOZA-HERNANDEZ v. STATE OF KANSAS

Date: 02-21-2019

Case Number:

Judge: Before ARNOLD-BURGER, C.J., GREEN and BUSER, JJ. PER CURIAM

Court:

Plaintiff's Attorney: Steven J. Obermeier, assistant solicitor general, and Derek Schmidt, attorney general

Defendant's Attorney: Carol Longenecker Schmidt, of Kansas Appellate Defender Office

Description:

Tulsa Contract Legal Secretarial Services

Outcome:

In conclusion, Hernandez failed to show that, under any Vontress factor, manifest injustice exists and that the one-year time limitation should be extended. See MendozaHernandez, 2018 WL 1973753, at *5. Accordingly, we affirm.

Affirmed.

Plaintiff's Experts:

Defendant's Experts:

Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of MARTIN MENDOZA-HERNANDEZ v. STATE OF KANSAS?

The outcome was: In conclusion, Hernandez failed to show that, under any Vontress factor, manifest injustice exists and that the one-year time limitation should be extended. See MendozaHernandez, 2018 WL 1973753, at *5. Accordingly, we affirm. Affirmed.

Who were the attorneys in MARTIN MENDOZA-HERNANDEZ v. STATE OF KANSAS?

Plaintiff's attorney: Steven J. Obermeier, assistant solicitor general, and Derek Schmidt, attorney general. Defendant's attorney: Carol Longenecker Schmidt, of Kansas Appellate Defender Office.

When was MARTIN MENDOZA-HERNANDEZ v. STATE OF KANSAS decided?

This case was decided on February 21, 2019.