Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Eric R. Sparkman v. Social Security Disability
Date: 07-29-2024
Case Number: 4:23-CV-37
Judge: Kellie M. Barr
Court: United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana (Floyd County)
Plaintiff's Attorney:
Click Here For The Best New Albany Social Security Disability Lawyer Directory
Defendant's Attorney: Christine Seagle, Jay Hinsley, Julian Clifford Wierenga
New Albany, Indiana social security disability lawyer represented the Plaintiff seeking review of the denial of his application of Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI beneifts.
Title XVI (Supplemental Security Income For The Aged, Blind, and Disabled) of the Social Security Act, as amended, established a national program, effective January 1, 1974, for the purpose of providing supplemental security income to individuals who have attained age 65 or are blind or disabled.
07/29/2024 18 JUDGMENT - Pursuant to the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58, the Court hereby ENTERS JUDGMENT in favor of the Plaintiff and REVERSES AND REMANDS this matter to the Agency for further administrative proceedings as authorized by the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Signed by Magistrate Judge Kellie M. Barr on 7/29/2024.(JRB) (Entered: 07/29/2024)
About This Case
What was the outcome of Eric R. Sparkman v. Social Security Disability?
The outcome was: 07/29/2024 17 ORDER granting 16 Motion to Remand - The Commissioner's decision is remanded for further administrative proceedings. On remand, the Administrative Law Judge will: 1) more fully address the medical source opinion evidence and explain the weight that evidence is accorded; 2) take further action to complete the administrative record resolving the above issues; and 3) issue a new decision. SEE ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kellie M. Barr on 7/29/2024. (JRB) (Entered: 07/29/2024) 07/29/2024 18 JUDGMENT - Pursuant to the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58, the Court hereby ENTERS JUDGMENT in favor of the Plaintiff and REVERSES AND REMANDS this matter to the Agency for further administrative proceedings as authorized by the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Signed by Magistrate Judge Kellie M. Barr on 7/29/2024.(JRB) (Entered: 07/29/2024)
Which court heard Eric R. Sparkman v. Social Security Disability?
This case was heard in United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana (Floyd County), IN. The presiding judge was Kellie M. Barr.
Who were the attorneys in Eric R. Sparkman v. Social Security Disability?
Plaintiff's attorney: Click Here For The Best New Albany Social Security Disability Lawyer Directory. Defendant's attorney: Christine Seagle, Jay Hinsley, Julian Clifford Wierenga.
When was Eric R. Sparkman v. Social Security Disability decided?
This case was decided on July 29, 2024.