Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

United States of America v. Flexsteel Industries, Inc.

Date: 10-24-2022

Case Number:

Judge:

Court: United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana (Lake County)

Plaintiff's Attorney: United States Attorney’s Office

Defendant's Attorney:







Click Here to Watch How To Find A Lawyer by Kent Morlan



Click Here For The Best Hammond Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory



If no lawyer is listed, call 918-582-6422 and MoreLaw will help you find a lawyer for free.



Description:
Hammond, Indiana civil litigation lawyers represented Defendant, Flexsteel, which was accused of contaminating the grand water of Elkhart, Indiana.



According to the complaint filed simultaneously with the proposed consent decree in the Northern District of Indiana, Flexsteel is liable for the cleanup because its former manufacturing operations contributed to contamination at the Lane Street Site. Previously, EPA entered into administrative settlements with two other potentially responsible parties for their alleged contributions to the contamination at the Lane Street Site.



"This settlement ensures that the responsible party and not the taxpayers fund the cleanup of the Lane Street Groundwater Contamination Superfund Site,” said Assistant Attorney General Todd Kim of the Justice Department's Environment and Natural Resources Division. "The cleanup funded by this agreement protects the environment and the health of the surrounding community.”



"This is an excellent settlement that funds necessary cleanup of a contaminated groundwater plume in Elkhart, Indiana,” said U.S. Attorney Clifford Johnson for the Northern District of Indiana. "This cleanup will protect the drinking water and health of Elkhart residents.”



"Groundwater is a drinking water source for wells and public water systems and it also flows to above-ground rivers and streams,” said EPA Regional Administrator Debra Shore. "Through this settlement and others like it, EPA is taking action to protect the health of communities and the environment by holding polluters accountable for groundwater contamination.”



"Indiana proudly works with our federal partners and industries across our state to make sure the health of Hoosiers and our environment is protected,” said Commissioner Brian Rockensuess of the Indiana Department of Environmental Management. "This settlement is great news for the people of Elkhart and will help ensure the cleanup of long-standing water contamination.”



The Lane Street Site consists of approximately 65 acres of residential and light industrial properties in Elkhart, Indiana, impacted by a groundwater plume contaminated primarily with solvents and degreasers such as trichloroethene and tetrachloroethene. In 2016, EPA issued its record of decision for the Lane Street Site that selected a remedy for treating the groundwater plume by breaking down the contamination into harmless compounds. The proposed consent decree funds implementation of the selected remedy.
Outcome:
Defendant agree to pay $9.8 million to settle the claims made against it.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of United States of America v. Flexsteel Industries, Inc.?

The outcome was: Defendant agree to pay $9.8 million to settle the claims made against it.

Which court heard United States of America v. Flexsteel Industries, Inc.?

This case was heard in United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana (Lake County), IN.

Who were the attorneys in United States of America v. Flexsteel Industries, Inc.?

Plaintiff's attorney: United States Attorney’s Office. Defendant's attorney: Click Here to Watch How To Find A Lawyer by Kent Morlan Click Here For The Best Hammond Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory If no lawyer is listed, call 918-582-6422 and MoreLaw will help you find a lawyer for free..

When was United States of America v. Flexsteel Industries, Inc. decided?

This case was decided on October 24, 2022.