Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Caleb Peters v. G&B Transportation Ltd. and Zbigniew Lekawski Morelaw Internet Marketing for Legal Professionals Click Here To Find A Lawyer 888-354-4529

Date: 05-14-2018

Case Number: 4:16-cv-00030-RL-JEM

Judge: Rudy Lozano

Court: United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana (Tippecanoe County)

Plaintiff's Attorney: John Schafer and Michael Stapleton

Defendant's Attorney: Katherine S Strawbridge, Katherine S Strawbridge and Robert R Foos, Jr.

Description:
Lafayette, IN - Caleb Peters sued G&B Transportation Ltd. and Zbigniew Lekawski on auto negligence theory.
Outcome:
05/14/2018 34 STIPULATION to Dismiss by Defendants Zbigniew Lekawski, G&B Transportation Ltd.. (Foos, Robert) (Entered: 05/14/2018)

05/14/2018 CASE DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 34 Stipulation per Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (mc) (Entered: 05/14/2018)
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of Caleb Peters v. G&B Transportation Ltd. and Zbigniew Leka...?

The outcome was: 05/14/2018 34 STIPULATION to Dismiss by Defendants Zbigniew Lekawski, G&B Transportation Ltd.. (Foos, Robert) (Entered: 05/14/2018) 05/14/2018 CASE DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 34 Stipulation per Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (mc) (Entered: 05/14/2018)

Which court heard Caleb Peters v. G&B Transportation Ltd. and Zbigniew Leka...?

This case was heard in United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana (Tippecanoe County), IN. The presiding judge was Rudy Lozano.

Who were the attorneys in Caleb Peters v. G&B Transportation Ltd. and Zbigniew Leka...?

Plaintiff's attorney: John Schafer and Michael Stapleton. Defendant's attorney: Katherine S Strawbridge, Katherine S Strawbridge and Robert R Foos, Jr..

When was Caleb Peters v. G&B Transportation Ltd. and Zbigniew Leka... decided?

This case was decided on May 14, 2018.