Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

United States of America v. Mark A. Pingsterhaus

Date: 03-06-2026

Case Number: 26-cr-30028

Judge: Stephen P. McGlynn

Court: United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois (St. Clair County)

Plaintiff's Attorney: United States District Attorney's Office in East St. Louis

Defendant's Attorney: Justin Ruehn

Description:
East St. Louis, Illinois criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with wire fraud and theft of government property.

Mark A. Pingsterhaus, age 52, of Carlyle, is accused of using City of Carlyle and Carlyle Fire Protection District funds for unauthorized and personal expenses like travel, entertainment, goods and services. In two examples, the indictment states he used the City of Carlyle’s bank card to purchase WNBA tickets and the Caryle Fire Protection District’s bank card to purchase jewelry from Zales.

“Our partnership to combat violent crime and drug trafficking with the Carlyle Police Department and surrounding agencies has led to results that have undoubtedly made the region safer. That being said, our mission is to not only combat violent crime, but to protect against the exploitation of the very systems designed to help our communities,” said FBI Springfield Field Office’s Special Agent in Charge Ruben Marchand-Morales. “When resources meant for community elevation are diverted for personal gain, it undermines the safety we work so hard to build and harms the community we swore to protect.”

He is also accused of using funds from the Carlyle Police Department’s Drug and Education Fund for personal expenses.

The FBI Springfield Field Office is leading the investigation, and Assistant U.S. Attorney Peter T. Reed is prosecuting the case.
Outcome:
An indictment is merely an allegation. A defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.

Convictions for wire fraud are punishable by up to 20 years’ imprisonment and theft of government funds can earn up to 10 years in federal prison.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of United States of America v. Mark A. Pingsterhaus?

The outcome was: An indictment is merely an allegation. A defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law. Convictions for wire fraud are punishable by up to 20 years’ imprisonment and theft of government funds can earn up to 10 years in federal prison.

Which court heard United States of America v. Mark A. Pingsterhaus?

This case was heard in United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois (St. Clair County), IL. The presiding judge was Stephen P. McGlynn.

Who were the attorneys in United States of America v. Mark A. Pingsterhaus?

Plaintiff's attorney: United States District Attorney's Office in East St. Louis. Defendant's attorney: Justin Ruehn.

When was United States of America v. Mark A. Pingsterhaus decided?

This case was decided on March 6, 2026.