Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Keith E. Lauderdale v. Madison F. Stanfill and Doordash, Inc.

Date: 08-04-2023

Case Number: 3:22-cv-00895

Judge: Mark A. Beatty

Court: United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois (St. Claire County)

Plaintiff's Attorney: Alvin Paulson and Grey Chatham

Defendant's Attorney: Thad Juilfs and Brent Reitter

Description:

East St. Louis, Illinois personal injury car wreck lawyers represented Plaintiff who sued Defendants on auto negligence theories.

"Illinois personal injury law is a complex area of law, but here are some of the key concepts to know:

Negligence: In order to recover damages for a personal injury in Illinois, you must prove that the other party was negligent. Negligence is defined as the failure to use reasonable care under the circumstances.

Contributory negligence: Illinois is a modified comparative negligence state, which means that your recovery can be reduced by your own percentage of fault. For example, if you are found to be 25% at fault for your own injury, your recovery will be reduced by 25%.

Statute of limitations: There is a statute of limitations on personal injury claims in Illinois. This means that you must file your lawsuit within a certain amount of time after your injury, or you will be barred from recovering damages. The statute of limitations for personal injury claims in Illinois is 2 years.

Damages: There are many different types of damages that you can recover in a personal injury case in Illinois. These include medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, and emotional distress.

If you have been injured in an accident in Illinois, it is important to speak with an experienced personal injury attorney as soon as possible. An attorney can help you understand your legal rights and options, and they can represent you in court if necessary."

Google Bard

Outcome:

08/04/2023 54 ORDER DISMISSING CASE: The parties filed 53 Stipulation of Dismissal, indicating this case should be dismissed with prejudice. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the Stipulation of Dismissal is effective immediately upon filing and does not require judicial approval. See e.g., Jenkins v. Village of Maywood, 506 F.3d 622, 624 (7th Cir. 2007). Consequently, this case is DISMISSED with prejudice in accordance with the parties' stipulation (Doc. 53), each party to bear its own costs, fees, and expenses, unless the parties agreed otherwise. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty on 8/4/2023. (klh2)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. (Entered: 08/04/2023)

08/04/2023 55 CLERK'S JUDGMENT. Approved by Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty on 8/4/2023. (klh2) (Entered: 08/04/2023)

Plaintiff's Experts:

Defendant's Experts:

Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of Keith E. Lauderdale v. Madison F. Stanfill and Doordash, ...?

The outcome was: 08/04/2023 54 ORDER DISMISSING CASE: The parties filed 53 Stipulation of Dismissal, indicating this case should be dismissed with prejudice. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the Stipulation of Dismissal is effective immediately upon filing and does not require judicial approval. See e.g., Jenkins v. Village of Maywood, 506 F.3d 622, 624 (7th Cir. 2007). Consequently, this case is DISMISSED with prejudice in accordance with the parties' stipulation (Doc. 53), each party to bear its own costs, fees, and expenses, unless the parties agreed otherwise. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty on 8/4/2023. (klh2)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. (Entered: 08/04/2023) 08/04/2023 55 CLERK'S JUDGMENT. Approved by Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty on 8/4/2023. (klh2) (Entered: 08/04/2023)

Which court heard Keith E. Lauderdale v. Madison F. Stanfill and Doordash, ...?

This case was heard in United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois (St. Claire County), IL. The presiding judge was Mark A. Beatty.

Who were the attorneys in Keith E. Lauderdale v. Madison F. Stanfill and Doordash, ...?

Plaintiff's attorney: Alvin Paulson and Grey Chatham. Defendant's attorney: Thad Juilfs and Brent Reitter.

When was Keith E. Lauderdale v. Madison F. Stanfill and Doordash, ... decided?

This case was decided on August 4, 2023.