Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Mandy L. Valentine v. Dan Merrill Valentine
Date: 09-30-2021
Case Number: 48254
Judge: Javier Gabiola
Court: Sixth Judicial District Court, Bannock County, Idaho
Plaintiff's Attorney:
Defendant's Attorney:
Description:
Pocatello, Idaho family law lawyers represented Petitioner and Respondent seeking a divorce.
This case concerns the determination of a student parent's income for purposes of
computing child support and the determination of parents' respective pro rata shares of childcare
expenses. Mandy Valentine ("Mandyâ€) and Dan Valentine ("Danâ€) divorced in 2015. In 2017,
Mandy petitioned the magistrate court for an order modifying the child custody and support
provisions of the divorce decree. The magistrate court did not modify the custody provisions in
the decree but concluded that substantial and material changes in circumstances existed to justify
modifying the child support order. Mandy appealed several aspects of this ruling to the district
court. The district court, sitting in an appellate capacity, affirmed in part and reversed in part the
magistrate court's order. On appeal to this Court, Mandy challenges the district court's conclusion
that her student loans and several other sources of income could be combined to calculate her
income under the Idaho Child Support Guidelines. Dan cross-appeals, challenging the district
court's conclusion that the magistrate court abused its discretion in calculating his pro rata share
of childcare expenses.
This case concerns the determination of a student parent's income for purposes of
computing child support and the determination of parents' respective pro rata shares of childcare
expenses. Mandy Valentine ("Mandyâ€) and Dan Valentine ("Danâ€) divorced in 2015. In 2017,
Mandy petitioned the magistrate court for an order modifying the child custody and support
provisions of the divorce decree. The magistrate court did not modify the custody provisions in
the decree but concluded that substantial and material changes in circumstances existed to justify
modifying the child support order. Mandy appealed several aspects of this ruling to the district
court. The district court, sitting in an appellate capacity, affirmed in part and reversed in part the
magistrate court's order. On appeal to this Court, Mandy challenges the district court's conclusion
that her student loans and several other sources of income could be combined to calculate her
income under the Idaho Child Support Guidelines. Dan cross-appeals, challenging the district
court's conclusion that the magistrate court abused its discretion in calculating his pro rata share
of childcare expenses.
Outcome:
Affirmed in part and reversed in part on appeal.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
About This Case
What was the outcome of Mandy L. Valentine v. Dan Merrill Valentine?
The outcome was: Affirmed in part and reversed in part on appeal.
Which court heard Mandy L. Valentine v. Dan Merrill Valentine?
This case was heard in Sixth Judicial District Court, Bannock County, Idaho, ID. The presiding judge was Javier Gabiola.
Who were the attorneys in Mandy L. Valentine v. Dan Merrill Valentine?
Plaintiff's attorney: Click Here to Watch How To Find A Lawyer by Kent Morlan Click Here For The Best Pocatello Divorce Lawyer Directory.
When was Mandy L. Valentine v. Dan Merrill Valentine decided?
This case was decided on September 30, 2021.