Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
United States of America v. Ephren Taylor, II
Date: 09-10-2025
Case Number: 14-CR-217
Judge:
Court: United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia (Fulton County)
Plaintiff's Attorney: United States District Attorney’s Office in Atlanta
Defendant's Attorney: Click Here For The Best Atlanta Criminal Defense Law Lawyer Directory
Description:
Atlanta, Georgia criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant petitioning for a writ of habeas corpus.
When it comes to federal habeas petitions, finality matters.
Without it, applications for habeas relief can quickly become un-
wieldy. To promote finality, the Antiterrorism and Effective Death
Penalty Act of 1996 ("AEDPAâ€), 28 U.S.C. §§ 2244(b) and 2255(h),
provides strict gatekeeping requirements for "second or succes-
sive†habeas filings. Exactly when these gatekeeping requirements
kick in is the subject of this appeal, which involves between fifteen
and twenty separate pro se motions and filings across two courts
and three appeals. The lamentable procedural complications here
illustrate just how important these gatekeeping requirements are
for the orderly adjudication of postconviction claims in federal
court.
As e
When it comes to federal habeas petitions, finality matters.
Without it, applications for habeas relief can quickly become un-
wieldy. To promote finality, the Antiterrorism and Effective Death
Penalty Act of 1996 ("AEDPAâ€), 28 U.S.C. §§ 2244(b) and 2255(h),
provides strict gatekeeping requirements for "second or succes-
sive†habeas filings. Exactly when these gatekeeping requirements
kick in is the subject of this appeal, which involves between fifteen
and twenty separate pro se motions and filings across two courts
and three appeals. The lamentable procedural complications here
illustrate just how important these gatekeeping requirements are
for the orderly adjudication of postconviction claims in federal
court.
As e
Outcome:
Denied.
Affirmed
Affirmed
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
About This Case
What was the outcome of United States of America v. Ephren Taylor, II?
The outcome was: Denied. Affirmed
Which court heard United States of America v. Ephren Taylor, II?
This case was heard in United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia (Fulton County), GA.
Who were the attorneys in United States of America v. Ephren Taylor, II?
Plaintiff's attorney: United States District Attorney’s Office in Atlanta. Defendant's attorney: Click Here For The Best Atlanta Criminal Defense Law Lawyer Directory.
When was United States of America v. Ephren Taylor, II decided?
This case was decided on September 10, 2025.