Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

National Community Development Services, Inc. v Mark L. Jennette

Date: 06-28-1999

Case Number: A99A0079

Judge: Ingram

Court: Superior Court, Cobb County, Georgia

Plaintiff's Attorney: Jeffrey T.Coleman, Atlanta, Georgia

Defendant's Attorney: Julian M. Treadaway, Marietta, Georgia.

Description:
Agency Law - Fundraising - Plaintiff alleged that while the defendant was acting as their agent, the defendant breached numerous agreements as well as his fiduciary duties. The plaintiff stated that the defendant diverted business directly to defendant. The defendant claimed that the agreements he made while acting as the plaintiff's agent were not enforceable and denied that he had breached any duties. The defendant also had several counterclaims and the parties both filed cross-motions for summary judgment, which were denied, except on the defendant's counterclaim request for conversion and punitive damages. This case was tried without jury intervention.
Outcome:
Plaintiff's verdict for $235,000.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Unknown
Defendant's Experts:
Unknown
Comments:
Affirmed with direction of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. See 520 S.E 2nd 231 (Ga.App. 1999). The above date reflects that of the appellate court and not that of the original trial. Reported by jjb.

About This Case

What was the outcome of National Community Development Services, Inc. v Mark L. J...?

The outcome was: Plaintiff's verdict for $235,000.

Which court heard National Community Development Services, Inc. v Mark L. J...?

This case was heard in Superior Court, Cobb County, Georgia, GA. The presiding judge was Ingram.

Who were the attorneys in National Community Development Services, Inc. v Mark L. J...?

Plaintiff's attorney: Jeffrey T.Coleman, Atlanta, Georgia. Defendant's attorney: Julian M. Treadaway, Marietta, Georgia..

When was National Community Development Services, Inc. v Mark L. J... decided?

This case was decided on June 28, 1999.