Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

LEONARD BRANDON PRINGLE, vs INGRID ESTHER PRINGLE

Date: 01-29-2022

Case Number: 21-0754

Judge: Ivan F. Fernandez

Court:

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
On appeal from The Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County

Plaintiff's Attorney:



Miami, FL – Best Divorce Lawyer Directory



Tell MoreLaw About Your Litigation Successes and MoreLaw Will Tell the World.



Re: MoreLaw National Jury Verdict and Settlement


Counselor:

MoreLaw collects and publishes civil and criminal litigation information from the state and federal courts nationwide. Publication is free and access to the information is free to the public.


MoreLaw will publish litigation reports submitted by you free of charge


Info@MoreLaw.com - 855-853-4800



Defendant's Attorney: M. Shannon McLin, and Erin Pogue Newell

Description:

Miami, FL - Divorce lawyer represented Appellant with appealing the Supplemental Final Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage.





A trial court's decision to award or deny alimony will not be disturbed

on appeal unless the record demonstrates that the trial court abused its

discretion.' Similarly, a trial court's ruling on equitable distribution is reviewed

for an abuse of discretion.” Weininger v. Weininger, 290 So. 3d 928, 932

(Fla. 3d DCA 2019).

Leonard Brandon Pringle ("the Husband”) argues that the trial court

erred in awarding durational alimony in the amount of $500 to Ingrid Esther

Pringle ("the Wife”) for a period of five years because the length of the

marriage was only four years and nine months. Section 61.08(7), Florida

Statutes (2021), explicitly states that the duration of the award "may not

exceed the length of the marriage.” Because of the strict statutory

requirement, we reverse the award for the sole purpose of limiting the award

3

to the exact length of the marriage, four years and nine months. We

otherwise affirm the award.

Additionally, the Husband argues that the trial court failed to equitably

divide the mortgage on the marital residence. In the order on appeal, the trial

court states that the only marital debt consists of the Wife's student loans,

failing to mention the mortgage. The trial court awarded the Husband

"exclusive use and possession of the Marital Home and [to] maintain all the

expenses of the Home.” A quitclaim deed was issued by the Wife, which

transfers title but does not affect the mortgage. See Pierson v. Bill, 182 So.

631 (Fla. 1938). We find that the language of the order is too vague for this

Court to assume that the mortgage is included in the Husband's expenses

to maintain the home.
Outcome:
Accordingly, we reverse and remand the alimony award to the extent

that its duration exceeds the length of the marriage, four years and nine

months. We also reverse and remand for a determination of the distribution

of the mortgage debt. We affirm as to all other issues without further

discussion.





Affirmed in part; reversed in part and remanded with instructions.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of LEONARD BRANDON PRINGLE, vs INGRID ESTHER PRINGLE?

The outcome was: Accordingly, we reverse and remand the alimony award to the extent that its duration exceeds the length of the marriage, four years and nine months. We also reverse and remand for a determination of the distribution of the mortgage debt. We affirm as to all other issues without further discussion. Affirmed in part; reversed in part and remanded with instructions.

Which court heard LEONARD BRANDON PRINGLE, vs INGRID ESTHER PRINGLE?

This case was heard in <center><b><H4>Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida </b> <br> <font color="green"><i>On appeal from The Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County </H4</i></font></center>, FL. The presiding judge was Ivan F. Fernandez.

Who were the attorneys in LEONARD BRANDON PRINGLE, vs INGRID ESTHER PRINGLE?

Plaintiff's attorney: Miami, FL – Best Divorce Lawyer Directory Tell MoreLaw About Your Litigation Successes and MoreLaw Will Tell the World. Re: MoreLaw National Jury Verdict and Settlement Counselor: MoreLaw collects and publishes civil and criminal litigation information from the state and federal courts nationwide. Publication is free and access to the information is free to the public. MoreLaw will publish litigation reports submitted by you free of charge Info@MoreLaw.com - 855-853-4800. Defendant's attorney: M. Shannon McLin, and Erin Pogue Newell.

When was LEONARD BRANDON PRINGLE, vs INGRID ESTHER PRINGLE decided?

This case was decided on January 29, 2022.