Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
LEONARD BRANDON PRINGLE, vs INGRID ESTHER PRINGLE
Date: 01-29-2022
Case Number: 21-0754
Judge: Ivan F. Fernandez
Court:
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
On appeal from The Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County
Plaintiff's Attorney:
Miami, FL – Best Divorce Lawyer Directory
Miami, FL – Best Divorce Lawyer Directory
Tell MoreLaw About Your Litigation Successes and MoreLaw Will Tell the World.
Re: MoreLaw National Jury Verdict and Settlement
Counselor:
MoreLaw collects and publishes civil and criminal litigation information from the state and federal courts nationwide. Publication is free and access to the information is free to the public.
MoreLaw will publish litigation reports submitted by you free of charge
Info@MoreLaw.com - 855-853-4800
Defendant's Attorney: M. Shannon McLin, and Erin Pogue Newell
Miami, FL - Divorce lawyer represented Appellant with appealing the Supplemental Final Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage.
A trial court's decision to award or deny alimony will not be disturbed
on appeal unless the record demonstrates that the trial court abused its
discretion.' Similarly, a trial court's ruling on equitable distribution is reviewed
for an abuse of discretion.†Weininger v. Weininger, 290 So. 3d 928, 932
(Fla. 3d DCA 2019).
Leonard Brandon Pringle ("the Husbandâ€) argues that the trial court
erred in awarding durational alimony in the amount of $500 to Ingrid Esther
Pringle ("the Wifeâ€) for a period of five years because the length of the
marriage was only four years and nine months. Section 61.08(7), Florida
Statutes (2021), explicitly states that the duration of the award "may not
exceed the length of the marriage.†Because of the strict statutory
requirement, we reverse the award for the sole purpose of limiting the award
3
to the exact length of the marriage, four years and nine months. We
otherwise affirm the award.
Additionally, the Husband argues that the trial court failed to equitably
divide the mortgage on the marital residence. In the order on appeal, the trial
court states that the only marital debt consists of the Wife's student loans,
failing to mention the mortgage. The trial court awarded the Husband
"exclusive use and possession of the Marital Home and [to] maintain all the
expenses of the Home.†A quitclaim deed was issued by the Wife, which
transfers title but does not affect the mortgage. See Pierson v. Bill, 182 So.
631 (Fla. 1938). We find that the language of the order is too vague for this
Court to assume that the mortgage is included in the Husband's expenses
to maintain the home.
that its duration exceeds the length of the marriage, four years and nine
months. We also reverse and remand for a determination of the distribution
of the mortgage debt. We affirm as to all other issues without further
discussion.
Affirmed in part; reversed in part and remanded with instructions.
About This Case
What was the outcome of LEONARD BRANDON PRINGLE, vs INGRID ESTHER PRINGLE?
The outcome was: Accordingly, we reverse and remand the alimony award to the extent that its duration exceeds the length of the marriage, four years and nine months. We also reverse and remand for a determination of the distribution of the mortgage debt. We affirm as to all other issues without further discussion. Affirmed in part; reversed in part and remanded with instructions.
Which court heard LEONARD BRANDON PRINGLE, vs INGRID ESTHER PRINGLE?
This case was heard in <center><b><H4>Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida </b> <br> <font color="green"><i>On appeal from The Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County </H4</i></font></center>, FL. The presiding judge was Ivan F. Fernandez.
Who were the attorneys in LEONARD BRANDON PRINGLE, vs INGRID ESTHER PRINGLE?
Plaintiff's attorney: Miami, FL – Best Divorce Lawyer Directory Tell MoreLaw About Your Litigation Successes and MoreLaw Will Tell the World. Re: MoreLaw National Jury Verdict and Settlement Counselor: MoreLaw collects and publishes civil and criminal litigation information from the state and federal courts nationwide. Publication is free and access to the information is free to the public. MoreLaw will publish litigation reports submitted by you free of charge Info@MoreLaw.com - 855-853-4800. Defendant's attorney: M. Shannon McLin, and Erin Pogue Newell.
When was LEONARD BRANDON PRINGLE, vs INGRID ESTHER PRINGLE decided?
This case was decided on January 29, 2022.