Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

United States of America v. Jack Lee Stapleton and Jack Hunter Stapleton

Date: 03-17-2021

Case Number:

Judge: None

Court: United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida (Broward County)

Plaintiff's Attorney: United States District Attorney’s Office

Defendant's Attorney:



Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory



Description:
Fort Lauderdale, Florida illegal kickback charge lawyer represented Defendants, Jack Lee Stapleton, of Gulf Stream, and Jack Hunter Stapleton, of Fort Lauderdale, formerly owned a marketing business in Fort Lauderdale which operated under various names, including CV McDowell LLC, and J&J Tel Marketing LLC (the Stapleton Entities).



The United States alleged that the Stapleton Entities, under the Stapletons' direction, used telemarketing to solicit prospective patients to accept compounded drugs regardless of patient need, procured prescriptions for those patients, and then sent those prescriptions to compounding pharmacies that agreed to pay the Stapleton Entities half of the amount TRICARE reimbursed for each prescription. The Stapletons and Stapleton Entities worked with pharmacies to identify compounded drug formulas that maximized the level of reimbursement for the drugs, regardless of the medical need for the chosen formula. They then sought to procure large volumes of prescriptions for those formulas. In many cases, the Stapleton Entities procured prescriptions by paying telemedicine providers who prescribed expensive compounded drugs without ever seeing the patients or conducting any meaningful medical examination.



"Kickback arrangements undermine confidence in our health care system,” said Acting Assistant Attorney General Brian M. Boynton of the Department of Justice's Civil Division. "This case demonstrates how kickback schemes often result in the provision of medically unnecessary services at the taxpayer's expense. The department is committed to holding accountable those who engage in such unlawful conduct.”



"This is another in a long line of this office's civil and criminal prosecutions of pharmacies, marketers, and prescribers – both individual and corporate – who exploited the TRICARE program for their personal gain and at substantial expense to taxpayers,” said Acting U.S. Attorney Karin Hoppmann for the Middle District of Florida. "We will continue to use all available resources to pursue those who defraud this and other federal healthcare programs and to return monies to those programs.”



"The Defense Criminal Investigative Service (DCIS) protects the integrity of Department of Defense programs, such as TRICARE, by rooting out those who choose to divert into their own pockets American taxpayer dollars intended to support our men and women in uniform,” said Special Agent in Charge Cyndy Bruce of the DCIS Southeast Field Office. "Individuals who unjustly enrich themselves will be held accountable.”



"We are grateful to those who came forward to expose these fraudulent practices and vow to continue our efforts to protect taxpayers from fraudsters siphoning money from the nation's health care system,” said Special Agent in Charge Michael McPherson of the FBI's Tampa Division.



As part of the settlement, the Stapletons have agreed to pay additional amounts in the event of certain contingencies.



The civil settlement includes the resolution of claims brought under the qui tam or whistleblower provisions of the False Claims Act by Dwayne Thornton against the Stapletons. Under the qui tam provisions of the False Claims Act, a private party can file an action on behalf of the United States and receive a portion of the settlement if the government takes over the case and reaches a monetary agreement with the defendant. Thornton is a former employee of one of the pharmacies to which the Stapleton Entities referred prescriptions. The share to be awarded from this settlement has not yet been determined. The qui tam case is captioned United States ex rel. Thornton v. National Compounding Co. et al., Case No. 8:15-cv-2647 (M.D. Fla.).



The resolutions obtained in this matter were the result of a coordinated effort between the Civil Division's Commercial Litigation Branch (Fraud Section), the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Middle District of Florida, the FBI, and DCIS.



The matter was investigated by Trial Attorney Nathan Green and Assistant U.S. Attorney Charles Harden.
Outcome:
Defendants agreed to Pay At Least $4 Million to Resolve False Claims Act Allegations.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of United States of America v. Jack Lee Stapleton and Jack H...?

The outcome was: Defendants agreed to Pay At Least $4 Million to Resolve False Claims Act Allegations.

Which court heard United States of America v. Jack Lee Stapleton and Jack H...?

This case was heard in United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida (Broward County), FL. The presiding judge was None.

Who were the attorneys in United States of America v. Jack Lee Stapleton and Jack H...?

Plaintiff's attorney: United States District Attorney’s Office. Defendant's attorney: Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory.

When was United States of America v. Jack Lee Stapleton and Jack H... decided?

This case was decided on March 17, 2021.