Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
ABRAHAM SENO BRIL AND JOSE SASSON-LERNER vs INTERIORS BY STEVEN G., INC.
Date: 09-28-2019
Case Number: 18-2398
Judge: Before EMAS, C.J., and SCALES and LOBREE, JJ. PER CURIAM
Court: Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Plaintiff's Attorney:
Call Kent Morlan at 888-354-4529 if you need a lawyer ⚖
Defendant's Attorney:
Description:
See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150,
1152 (Fla. 1979) (observing: “The question raised by [appellant] clearly involves
underlying issues of fact. When there are issues of fact the appellant necessarily asks
the reviewing court to draw conclusions about the evidence. Without a record of the
trial proceedings, the appellate court cannot properly resolve the underlying factual
issues so as to conclude that the trial court's judgment is not supported by the
evidence or by an alternative theory.
Call Kent Morlan at 888-354-4529 if you need a lawyer ⚖
MoreLaw Virtual ReceptionistsA Receptionist for Five Dollars A Day
See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150,
1152 (Fla. 1979) (observing: “The question raised by [appellant] clearly involves
underlying issues of fact. When there are issues of fact the appellant necessarily asks
the reviewing court to draw conclusions about the evidence. Without a record of the
trial proceedings, the appellate court cannot properly resolve the underlying factual
issues so as to conclude that the trial court's judgment is not supported by the
evidence or by an alternative theory.
Outcome:
Without knowing the factual context, neither can an appellate court reasonably conclude that the trial judge so misconceived the law as to require reversal”).
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
About This Case
What was the outcome of ABRAHAM SENO BRIL AND JOSE SASSON-LERNER vs INTERIORS BY ...?
The outcome was: Without knowing the factual context, neither can an appellate court reasonably conclude that the trial judge so misconceived the law as to require reversal”).
Which court heard ABRAHAM SENO BRIL AND JOSE SASSON-LERNER vs INTERIORS BY ...?
This case was heard in Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, FL. The presiding judge was Before EMAS, C.J., and SCALES and LOBREE, JJ. PER CURIAM.
Who were the attorneys in ABRAHAM SENO BRIL AND JOSE SASSON-LERNER vs INTERIORS BY ...?
Plaintiff's attorney: Call Kent Morlan at 888-354-4529 if you need a lawyer ⚖.
When was ABRAHAM SENO BRIL AND JOSE SASSON-LERNER vs INTERIORS BY ... decided?
This case was decided on September 28, 2019.