Knecht v. Katz

This is literally a barking dog case. Appellees sought injunctive relieve in regard to
appellants' Great Pyrenees' constant barking while it was permitted to remain outside
appellants' home. Appellees' request was to enjoin appellants from maintaining the dog
on their property "in such manner as to create noise sufficient to impair Plaintiffs' peaceful
and quiet enjoyment of their property." Instead, the trial court gave appellants 30 days to remove the dog from their premises. We agree with appellants that the court went too far.
In addition, it granted a remedy not sought by appellees. Appellees never complained that
the dog disturbed them when it was within appellants' home. Some barking must be
expected from dogs. Before appellants can be judicially required to remove their dog from
their premises, they should be given the opportunity to cure the problem which disturbed
appellees. The dog should not be permitted to remain outdoors unattended so that
continuous barking might disturb the neighbors. However, if keeping the dog indoors or
bringing the dog indoors when it starts barking will cure the problem, the injunction should
go no further.

REVERSED and REMANDED with instructions to amend the injunction in
accordance with this opinion.

Unknown

Unknown

None