Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Collins v. State Of Delaware
Date: 01-09-2016
Case Number: 209, 2015
Judge: Leo E. Strine, Jr. Randy J. Holland, Collins J. Seitz, Jr.,
Court: IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
Plaintiff's Attorney: Timothy Donovan
Defendant's Attorney: Robert M. Goff
Description:
This 6th day of January 2016, upon consideration of the notice to show
cause and the response and reply thereto, it appears to the Court that:
(1) The appellant, Jason Collins, filed this appeal from the Superior
Court’s order denying his motion for correction of sentence. Collins argued below
and on appeal that he is entitled to more credit time against the Level V portion of
his sixth violation of probation sentence. While the appeal was pending, Collins
completed the Level V portion of his sentence and was released from custody. The
Clerk of the Court issued a notice to Collins to show cause why the appeal should
be dismissed because the issue on appeal is now moot.
Collins filed a response arguing that the issue of his entitlement to
Level V credit time is not moot because he is still serving Level I probation, and he
might violate his probation again and potentially be subject to more Level V
incarceration. The State asserts that the issue of Level V credit time is moot.
After careful consideration, the Court concludes that Collins’ release
from Level V custody has rendered his request for Level V credit time moot.1 Any
decision on Collins’ request for credit time would amount to an impermissible
advisory opinion and would be a waste of scarce judicial resources.2 If Collins
should violate his probation for a seventh time, he can raise the issue of his
entitlement to Level V credit with the Superior Court before any future VOP
sentencing.
cause and the response and reply thereto, it appears to the Court that:
(1) The appellant, Jason Collins, filed this appeal from the Superior
Court’s order denying his motion for correction of sentence. Collins argued below
and on appeal that he is entitled to more credit time against the Level V portion of
his sixth violation of probation sentence. While the appeal was pending, Collins
completed the Level V portion of his sentence and was released from custody. The
Clerk of the Court issued a notice to Collins to show cause why the appeal should
be dismissed because the issue on appeal is now moot.
Collins filed a response arguing that the issue of his entitlement to
Level V credit time is not moot because he is still serving Level I probation, and he
might violate his probation again and potentially be subject to more Level V
incarceration. The State asserts that the issue of Level V credit time is moot.
After careful consideration, the Court concludes that Collins’ release
from Level V custody has rendered his request for Level V credit time moot.1 Any
decision on Collins’ request for credit time would amount to an impermissible
advisory opinion and would be a waste of scarce judicial resources.2 If Collins
should violate his probation for a seventh time, he can raise the issue of his
entitlement to Level V credit with the Superior Court before any future VOP
sentencing.
Outcome:
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the appeal is hereby
DISMISSED as moot.
DISMISSED as moot.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
About This Case
What was the outcome of Collins v. State Of Delaware?
The outcome was: NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the appeal is hereby DISMISSED as moot.
Which court heard Collins v. State Of Delaware?
This case was heard in IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, DE. The presiding judge was Leo E. Strine, Jr. Randy J. Holland, Collins J. Seitz, Jr.,.
Who were the attorneys in Collins v. State Of Delaware?
Plaintiff's attorney: Timothy Donovan. Defendant's attorney: Robert M. Goff.
When was Collins v. State Of Delaware decided?
This case was decided on January 9, 2016.