Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Karla Rosa v. Anesthesia Associates of New London
Date: 05-13-2011
Case Number: KNL-CV-08-5006331-S
Judge: Emmet Cosgrove
Court: Superior Court, New London, Connecticut
Plaintiff's Attorney: Sean McElligott, Koskoff, Koskoff & Bieder, P.C., Bridgeport, Connecticut
Defendant's Attorney: Robert Cooney, Williams, Cooney & Sheehy, Trumbull, Connecticut
Ms. Rosa spent 26 days in a coma followed by 29 days in the hospital's intensive care unit and 45 days in verbal and orthopedic rehabilitation, according to court documents.
She also suffered nerve damage, memory loss, had to use a feeding tub and venous catheter, had a tracheotomy and was left with a tracheotomy scar, has pain in her feet and other physiological, psychological and neurological side effects, according to the documents.
The Defendants defended the case by arguing that the use of an LMA in a morbidly obese patient was within the standard of care. On causation, the defendants argued that an aspiration had not occurred.
The defenses asserted by Defendants are not available.
Some information for this report came from: The Day
About This Case
What was the outcome of Karla Rosa v. Anesthesia Associates of New London?
The outcome was: Plaintiffs' verdict for $10.5 million.
Which court heard Karla Rosa v. Anesthesia Associates of New London?
This case was heard in Superior Court, New London, Connecticut, CT. The presiding judge was Emmet Cosgrove.
Who were the attorneys in Karla Rosa v. Anesthesia Associates of New London?
Plaintiff's attorney: Sean McElligott, Koskoff, Koskoff & Bieder, P.C., Bridgeport, Connecticut. Defendant's attorney: Robert Cooney, Williams, Cooney & Sheehy, Trumbull, Connecticut.
When was Karla Rosa v. Anesthesia Associates of New London decided?
This case was decided on May 13, 2011.