Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
James Riccio and Madeline Riccio v. United States of America
Date: 07-06-2021
Case Number: 3:21-cv-00630-JAM
Judge: Jeffrey A. Meyer
Court: United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (New Haven County)
Plaintiff's Attorney:
Best New Haven Injury Lawyer Directory
Best New Haven Injury Lawyer Directory
Defendant's Attorney: Michelle Lynn McConaghy
Generally speaking all negligence cases have the same three elements: (1) failure to exercise due care, (2) injury as a direct result of the failure to exercise due care, and a direct casual relationship between the failure to exercise due care and the claimed injuries and/or damages.
The defenses usually asserted by defendants are no negligence, no damages, claimed injuries existed before the claimed event and/or contributory or comparative negligence.
07/06/2021 11 JUDGMENT entered in favor of USA against plaintiffs James Riccio and Madeline Riccio.
For Appeal Forms please go to the following website: http://www.ctd.uscourts.gov/forms/all-forms/appeals_forms
Signed by Clerk on 7/6/21.(Barry, Donna) (Entered: 07/06/2021)
07/06/2021 JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS SURVEY - FOR COUNSEL ONLY: The following link to the confidential survey requires you to log into CM/ECF for SECURITY purposes. Once in CM/ECF you will be prompted for the case number. Although you are receiving this survey through CM/ECF, it is hosted on an independent website called SurveyMonkey. Once in SurveyMonkey, the survey is located in a secure account. The survey is not docketed and it is not sent directly to the judge. To ensure anonymity, completed surveys are held up to 90 days before they are sent to the judge for review. We hope you will take this opportunity to participate, please click on this link:
https://ecf.ctd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/Dispatch.pl?survey
(Barry, Donna) (Entered: 07/06/2021)
About This Case
What was the outcome of James Riccio and Madeline Riccio v. United States of America?
The outcome was: 07/06/2021 10 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS (Doc. # 9 ). The docket reflects that defendant USA filed a motion to dismiss on June 1, 2021 and that plaintiffs have not filed any objection or other response. This Court's rules provide that "[f]ailure to submit a memorandum in opposition to a motion may be deemed sufficient cause to grant the motion, except where the pleadings provide sufficient grounds to deny the motion." D. Conn. Local Civ. R. 7(a). Based on plaintiffs' failure to file an opposition and based on the Court's conclusion--after review of the arguments set forth in the motion to dismiss--that there is substantial merit to the motion to dismiss, the Court GRANTS the motion to dismiss with prejudice for failure to timely exhaust administrative remedies. The Clerk of Court shall close this case. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 07/06/2021. (Martinez, C.) (Entered: 07/06/2021) 07/06/2021 11 JUDGMENT entered in favor of USA against plaintiffs James Riccio and Madeline Riccio. For Appeal Forms please go to the following website: http://www.ctd.uscourts.gov/forms/all-forms/appeals_forms Signed by Clerk on 7/6/21.(Barry, Donna) (Entered: 07/06/2021) 07/06/2021 JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS SURVEY - FOR COUNSEL ONLY: The following link to the confidential survey requires you to log into CM/ECF for SECURITY purposes. Once in CM/ECF you will be prompted for the case number. Although you are receiving this survey through CM/ECF, it is hosted on an independent website called SurveyMonkey. Once in SurveyMonkey, the survey is located in a secure account. The survey is not docketed and it is not sent directly to the judge. To ensure anonymity, completed surveys are held up to 90 days before they are sent to the judge for review. We hope you will take this opportunity to participate, please click on this link: https://ecf.ctd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/Dispatch.pl?survey (Barry, Donna) (Entered: 07/06/2021)
Which court heard James Riccio and Madeline Riccio v. United States of America?
This case was heard in United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (New Haven County), CT. The presiding judge was Jeffrey A. Meyer.
Who were the attorneys in James Riccio and Madeline Riccio v. United States of America?
Plaintiff's attorney: Best New Haven Injury Lawyer Directory. Defendant's attorney: Michelle Lynn McConaghy.
When was James Riccio and Madeline Riccio v. United States of America decided?
This case was decided on July 6, 2021.