Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

State of California, et al. v. Albertsons, et al.

Date: 04-27-2000

Case Number: Unknown

Judge: Unknown

Court: Superior Court, Los Angles County, California

Plaintiff's Attorney: California Attorney General Bill Lockyer, Sacramento, California

Defendant's Attorney: Unknown

Description:
Proposition 65 * otherwise known as the California Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986 * was passed by the voters to protect the public from exposure to toxic substances known to cause cancer or be harmful to reproductive health. The law requires businesses to provide "clear and reasonable" warning before exposing anyone to a chemical on the Proposition 65 list. The warning is required unless the business can show that the exposure poses no significant risk.



While impossible to prove that any individual developed cancer as a result of being exposed to diesel exhaust from any of the distribution centers, state investigators determined that community residents near the grocery distribution centers were being exposed to levels that pose a risk and require a public warning under Proposition 65.


The State of California, the Natural Resources Defense Council, Coalition for Clean Air, Inc. and the Environmental Law Foundation all claimed that heavy-duty diesel trucks traveling to and from the distribution centers of three major California grocery chains were producing potential cancer risks as a result of being exposed to harmful exhausts from the trucks.

Outcome:
The settlement was reached with Albertsons/Luckys, Ralphs and Vons/Safeway, after more than a year of negotiations.


Under the settlement, the grocery chains will mail or deliver specified warnings about exposure to cancer-causing diesel exhaust to residents who live near company distribution centers. The distribution centers are Albertsons/Lucky in Buena Park (Orange County) and San Leandro; Vons/Safeway in Santa Fe Springs and El Monte; and Ralphs in Glendale. While not specifically required by Proposition 65, the companies agreed to provide the warnings in English and Spanish. Many of the community residents are Hispanic.



The grocery chains also agreed to lower diesel emissions by reducing the idling time for trucks at the distribution centers and to conduct a three-year demonstration project using alternative fuel vehicles. Vons will be testing 60 heavy-duty natural gas trucks, while Albertsons and Ralphs will each use 25 alternative fuel trucks to reduce emissions. These trucks are limited to having 15 percent of their power coming from diesel fuel. The demonstration project is likely to produce the largest fleet of heavy-duty natural gas trucks in the nation.

Plaintiff's Experts:
Unknown
Defendant's Experts:
Unknown
Comments:
None

About This Case

What was the outcome of State of California, et al. v. Albertsons, et al.?

The outcome was: The settlement was reached with Albertsons/Luckys, Ralphs and Vons/Safeway, after more than a year of negotiations. Under the settlement, the grocery chains will mail or deliver specified warnings about exposure to cancer-causing diesel exhaust to residents who live near company distribution centers. The distribution centers are Albertsons/Lucky in Buena Park (Orange County) and San Leandro; Vons/Safeway in Santa Fe Springs and El Monte; and Ralphs in Glendale. While not specifically required by Proposition 65, the companies agreed to provide the warnings in English and Spanish. Many of the community residents are Hispanic. The grocery chains also agreed to lower diesel emissions by reducing the idling time for trucks at the distribution centers and to conduct a three-year demonstration project using alternative fuel vehicles. Vons will be testing 60 heavy-duty natural gas trucks, while Albertsons and Ralphs will each use 25 alternative fuel trucks to reduce emissions. These trucks are limited to having 15 percent of their power coming from diesel fuel. The demonstration project is likely to produce the largest fleet of heavy-duty natural gas trucks in the nation.

Which court heard State of California, et al. v. Albertsons, et al.?

This case was heard in Superior Court, Los Angles County, California, CA. The presiding judge was Unknown.

Who were the attorneys in State of California, et al. v. Albertsons, et al.?

Plaintiff's attorney: California Attorney General Bill Lockyer, Sacramento, California. Defendant's attorney: Unknown.

When was State of California, et al. v. Albertsons, et al. decided?

This case was decided on April 27, 2000.