Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Juan Romo v. Ford Motor Co.
Date: 07-13-1999
Case Number: 82318
Judge: Roger Beauchesne
Court: Superior Court, Stanislaus County, California
Plaintiff's Attorney: Joseph W. Carcione, Jr., Redwood City, California and Laurence E. Drivon of Drivon & Tabak, P.C., Stockton, California
Defendant's Attorney: Frank Kelly of Dryden, Margoles, Schimaneck, Kelly & Wait, San Francisco, California for Ford.
A former Ford executive, Tom Feeney, testified on behalf of the Romos, saying company officials knew the roof was virtually certain to fail.
Ford denied that the Bronco was defective or unreasonably dangerous.
The United States Supreme Court reversed and remanded this case to the California Court System.
About This Case
What was the outcome of Juan Romo v. Ford Motor Co.?
The outcome was: Plaintiff's verdict for $5 million in compensatory damages and $290 million in punitive damages.
Which court heard Juan Romo v. Ford Motor Co.?
This case was heard in Superior Court, Stanislaus County, California, CA. The presiding judge was Roger Beauchesne.
Who were the attorneys in Juan Romo v. Ford Motor Co.?
Plaintiff's attorney: Joseph W. Carcione, Jr., Redwood City, California and Laurence E. Drivon of Drivon & Tabak, P.C., Stockton, California. Defendant's attorney: Frank Kelly of Dryden, Margoles, Schimaneck, Kelly & Wait, San Francisco, California for Ford..
When was Juan Romo v. Ford Motor Co. decided?
This case was decided on July 13, 1999.