Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Ormco Corporation and Danaher Corporation v. Align Technology, Inc.

Date: 06-27-2009

Case Number: 8:03-cv-00016-CAS-AN

Judge: Christina A. Snyder

Court: United States District Court for the Central District of California, Los Angeles County

Plaintiff's Attorney: Charles Crueger, John Flanagan, Richard H Marschall, Joseph T Miotke and David L DeBruin, Michael Best & Friedrich, Milwaukee, Wisconsin and

Defendant's Attorney: Dan Furniss, Susan C Moon, John E Lord, Gary H Ritchey, Anne M Rogaski,Susan M Spaeth, Jon V Swenson and Heidi Kim, Townsend Townsend & Crew, Palo Alto, California

Description:
Ormco Corporation, et al. sued Align Technology, Inc. on a patent infringment theory claiming that Align's Invisalign teeth straightening system infringed on a patent held by its subsidary Danaher Corporation.
Outcome:
Plaintiff's verdict.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of Ormco Corporation and Danaher Corporation v. Align Techno...?

The outcome was: Plaintiff's verdict.

Which court heard Ormco Corporation and Danaher Corporation v. Align Techno...?

This case was heard in United States District Court for the Central District of California, Los Angeles County, CA. The presiding judge was Christina A. Snyder.

Who were the attorneys in Ormco Corporation and Danaher Corporation v. Align Techno...?

Plaintiff's attorney: Charles Crueger, John Flanagan, Richard H Marschall, Joseph T Miotke and David L DeBruin, Michael Best & Friedrich, Milwaukee, Wisconsin and. Defendant's attorney: Dan Furniss, Susan C Moon, John E Lord, Gary H Ritchey, Anne M Rogaski,Susan M Spaeth, Jon V Swenson and Heidi Kim, Townsend Townsend & Crew, Palo Alto, California.

When was Ormco Corporation and Danaher Corporation v. Align Techno... decided?

This case was decided on June 27, 2009.