Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

United States of America v. Isaac Jimenez

Date: 10-15-2026

Case Number: 3:25-cr-02648

Judge: Janis L. Sammartino

Court: United States District Court for the Southern District of California (San Diego County)

Plaintiff's Attorney: Robert J. Miller and Samson Joseph Schatz

Defendant's Attorney: Douglas Brown

Description:
San Diego, California, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with bringing in aliens without Presentation for Financial Gain, Conspiracy to Bring Certain Aliens, in violation of 8 U.S.C. 1324.

Isaac Jimenez, lived in Escondido before moving to Tijuana, and was involved in alien smuggling for years before joining the organization in 2024. He was convicted of alien-smuggling offenses in 2015 and 2017 and was arrested again in 2022 in connection with another smuggling investigation. In early 2024, after being released from custody in Mexico, Jimenez began working for members of a Tijuana-based organization, transporting migrants from the border area to locations in the United States for payment.

As Jimenez became more involved, he learned that the organization was holding migrants against their will and demanding additional payments from them and their families as a condition of their release. He also received photographs and videos depicting kidnappings and murders involving members of the organization. Despite this knowledge, Jimenez continued to participate in the conspiracy.

In September 2024, the organization agreed to smuggle C.G.C., a father of four U.S. citizen children who had previously resided in Southern California, into the United States from Mexico. Instead of being smuggled into the United States, C.G.C. was held captive in Mexico while his kidnappers demanded $30,000 from his family and threatened to kill him.

At the direction of his coconspirators, Jimenez collected $15,000 in ransom payments from C.G.C.’s wife, transported the money to Tijuana and delivered it to the kidnappers. Additional ransom demands followed, including demands for money and vehicles. When the family could no longer pay, the kidnappers threatened to provide the location of C.G.C.’s body. Communications eventually ceased. C.G.C. remains missing and, according to court documents, is presumed to have been killed in Mexico by Jimenez’s coconspirators.

Three months later, Jimenez agreed to coordinate the smuggling of V.A.E., a 21-year-old Mexican woman, for $7,000. Jimenez was to earn a $1,000 commission. Instead, his coconspirators took V.A.E. to a safe house and held her captive, demanding $30,000 from her family for her release. The kidnappers sent videos showing V.A.E. being threatened with firearms and beaten; they threatened to kill her if the ransom was not paid.

V.A.E.’s family eventually paid approximately $10,000, but she was never released. Her skeletal remains were discovered in the Tijuana area in November 2025 and were identified through DNA testing. According to court documents, V.A.E. was likely killed in Mexico by Jimenez’s coconspirators.
Outcome:
The Defendant was found guilty and was sentenced to 144 months. 120 months as to Count 2. 60 months as to Count 1; 24 months to run consecutive to Count 2 and 36 months to run concurrent to Count 2 for a total of 144 months. Supervised release for 3 years as to each count 1 and 2 to run concurrent for a total of 3 years. $100.00 assessment as to count 1 and 2 for a total $200.00 imposed, $5,000.00 JVTA is waived and no fine. Restitution in the amount of $24,500.00 (interest waived) is imposed.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of United States of America v. Isaac Jimenez?

The outcome was: The Defendant was found guilty and was sentenced to 144 months. 120 months as to Count 2. 60 months as to Count 1; 24 months to run consecutive to Count 2 and 36 months to run concurrent to Count 2 for a total of 144 months. Supervised release for 3 years as to each count 1 and 2 to run concurrent for a total of 3 years. $100.00 assessment as to count 1 and 2 for a total $200.00 imposed, $5,000.00 JVTA is waived and no fine. Restitution in the amount of $24,500.00 (interest waived) is imposed.

Which court heard United States of America v. Isaac Jimenez?

This case was heard in United States District Court for the Southern District of California (San Diego County), CA. The presiding judge was Janis L. Sammartino.

Who were the attorneys in United States of America v. Isaac Jimenez?

Plaintiff's attorney: Robert J. Miller and Samson Joseph Schatz. Defendant's attorney: Douglas Brown.

When was United States of America v. Isaac Jimenez decided?

This case was decided on October 15, 2026.