Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
John Woolard, et al. v. Tony Thurmond, et al.
Date: 09-18-2025
Case Number: 24-CV-2305
Judge: John A. Mende
Court: United States District Court for the Eastern District of California District of * (Sacramento County)
Plaintiff's Attorney: <center><h2><a href="https://www.morelaw.com/california/lawyers/sacramento/civil_rights.asp"target="_new"><h2>Click Here For The Best Sacramento Civil Rights Law Lawyer Directory</h2></a></font><br> </h2></center><br>
Defendant's Attorney: Thomas H. Prouty (argued) and D. Michael Ambrose, Deputy General Counsels; Paul Gant and Bruce Yonehiro, Assistant General Counsels; Len Garfinkel, General Counsel; California Department of Education, Sacramento, California; et al.
About This Case
What was the outcome of John Woolard, et al. v. Tony Thurmond, et al.?
The outcome was: A public school’s curriculum qualifies as government speech and therefore is not subject to scrutiny under the Free Speech Clause.
Which court heard John Woolard, et al. v. Tony Thurmond, et al.?
This case was heard in United States District Court for the Eastern District of California District of * (Sacramento County), CA. The presiding judge was John A. Mende.
Who were the attorneys in John Woolard, et al. v. Tony Thurmond, et al.?
Plaintiff's attorney: Click Here For The Best Sacramento Civil Rights Law Lawyer Directory. Defendant's attorney: Thomas H. Prouty (argued) and D. Michael Ambrose, Deputy General Counsels; Paul Gant and Bruce Yonehiro, Assistant General Counsels; Len Garfinkel, General Counsel; California Department of Education, Sacramento, California; et al..
When was John Woolard, et al. v. Tony Thurmond, et al. decided?
This case was decided on September 18, 2025.