Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Christopher Garnier; Kimberly Garnier v. Michelle O'Connor Ratcliff; T.j. Zane

Date: 05-29-2025

Case Number: 12-CV-2215

Judge: Not Available

Court: United States District Court for the Southern District of California (Los Angeles County)

Plaintiff's Attorney: <a href="http://www.morelaw.com/lawyers/atty.asp?f=Cory&l=Briggs&i=120778&z=91786" target="_new">Cory Briggs</a>

Defendant's Attorney: Daniel Shinoff, Jack Sleeth, Jr. and Paul Carelli IV

Description:
Los Angeles, California civil rights lawyers represented the parties in a 42 U.S.C. 1983.



Christopher and Kimberly Garnier brought this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit challenging the actions of Michelle

O'Connor-Ratcliff and T.J. Zane, members of the Poway Unified School District ("PUSD” or "the District”) Board of Trustees. O'Connor-Ratcliff and Zane (collectively referred to as "the Trustees”) used their public Facebook and Twitter

pages to post about goings-on at PUSD and their activities as Trustees. In response to the Garniers' numerous critical

and often repetitive comments on the Trustees' social media pages, the Trustees deleted or hid the Garniers' comments.

Later, the Trustees began blocking the Garniers from interacting on their social media accounts altogether. The

Garniers brought suit under § 1983, alleging that the Trustees' actions violated the Garniers' First Amendment rights.



* * *



MoreLaw's goal is to help people seeking legal assistance to find the best lawyers available to represent them in any county in the United States. Click the link above to see some lawyers available where this case was tried who might be available to represent you. Call 833-200-3094 if you need help finding a lawyer.

Outcome:
Following a bench trial, the district court agreed with the Garniers and awarded them declaratory and injunctive relief. We affirmed that judgment, and the Trustees appealed to the Supreme Court.



Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of Christopher Garnier; Kimberly Garnier v. Michelle O'Conno...?

The outcome was: Following a bench trial, the district court agreed with the Garniers and awarded them declaratory and injunctive relief. We affirmed that judgment, and the Trustees appealed to the Supreme Court.

Which court heard Christopher Garnier; Kimberly Garnier v. Michelle O'Conno...?

This case was heard in United States District Court for the Southern District of California (Los Angeles County), CA. The presiding judge was Not Available.

Who were the attorneys in Christopher Garnier; Kimberly Garnier v. Michelle O'Conno...?

Plaintiff's attorney: Cory Briggs. Defendant's attorney: Daniel Shinoff, Jack Sleeth, Jr. and Paul Carelli IV.

When was Christopher Garnier; Kimberly Garnier v. Michelle O'Conno... decided?

This case was decided on May 29, 2025.