Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
The People v. Eduardo Anaya Solis, a/k/a Sleepy and Armando Juarez, a/k/a Trips
Date: 06-17-2022
Case Number:
Judge:
Court: Superior Court, Monterey County, California
Plaintiff's Attorney: Salinas County California District Attorney's Office
Defendant's Attorney:
Description:
Salinas, California criminal defense lawyer represented defendant charged with murder.
Eduardo Anaya Solis, a/k/a Sleepy, age 21, and Armando Juarez, a/k/a Trips, age 24, were accused of shooting and killing Charles Adolfo Jose, age 19, from Greenfield. Solis and other Sureño gang members ganged up on January 13, 2019, to find and kill a rival Norteño gang member.
Eduardo Anaya Solis, a/k/a Sleepy, age 21, and Armando Juarez, a/k/a Trips, age 24, were accused of shooting and killing Charles Adolfo Jose, age 19, from Greenfield. Solis and other Sureño gang members ganged up on January 13, 2019, to find and kill a rival Norteño gang member.
Outcome:
Bother were found guilty. Solis faces a maximum term of 80 years to life in prison and Juarez faces a sentence of 60 years to life.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
About This Case
What was the outcome of The People v. Eduardo Anaya Solis, a/k/a Sleepy and Arman...?
The outcome was: Bother were found guilty. Solis faces a maximum term of 80 years to life in prison and Juarez faces a sentence of 60 years to life.
Which court heard The People v. Eduardo Anaya Solis, a/k/a Sleepy and Arman...?
This case was heard in Superior Court, Monterey County, California, CA.
Who were the attorneys in The People v. Eduardo Anaya Solis, a/k/a Sleepy and Arman...?
Plaintiff's attorney: Salinas County California District Attorney's Office. Defendant's attorney: Click Here to Watch How To Find A Lawyer by Kent Morlan Click Here For The Best Monterey Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory.
When was The People v. Eduardo Anaya Solis, a/k/a Sleepy and Arman... decided?
This case was decided on June 17, 2022.