Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Jane Doe v. John Roe, et al.
Date: 04-26-2022
Case Number:
Judge: Not Available
Court: Superior County, Los Angeles County, California
Plaintiff's Attorney: Sean Muntz and Matt Baker
Defendant's Attorney: Not Available
Description:
Los Angeles, California personal injury lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on sexual harassment, invasion of privacy and intentional infliction of emotion distress.
Plaintiff claimed that among other things videotaped her while showering.
Plaintiff claimed that among other things videotaped her while showering.
Outcome:
Plaintiff's verdict for $3.65 million, including $3 million in punitive damages.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
About This Case
What was the outcome of Jane Doe v. John Roe, et al.?
The outcome was: Plaintiff's verdict for $3.65 million, including $3 million in punitive damages.
Which court heard Jane Doe v. John Roe, et al.?
This case was heard in Superior County, Los Angeles County, California, CA. The presiding judge was Not Available.
Who were the attorneys in Jane Doe v. John Roe, et al.?
Plaintiff's attorney: Sean Muntz and Matt Baker. Defendant's attorney: Not Available.
When was Jane Doe v. John Roe, et al. decided?
This case was decided on April 26, 2022.