Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
United States of America v. Ray Cornelius Calvert
Date: 11-17-2025
Case Number: 21-cr-40003
Judge: Susan O. Hickey
Court: United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas (Miller County)
Plaintiff's Attorney: United States District Attorney’s Office in Texarkana
Defendant's Attorney:
Click Here For The Best Texarkana Criminal Defense Law Lawyer Directory
Description:
Texarkana, Arkansas, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with possession with
intent to distribute a controlled substance, 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(A)(viii).
Ray Calvert was driving a rental car when an Arkansas state trooper stopped him for illegal lane changes. While waiting for dispatch to run criminal history reports, the passenger who rented the car consented to a search. The trooper found-2-bundles of methamphetamine in the glove box.
Calvert argues that the stop was unconstitutional. He claims he didn't commit a traffic violation, so the trooper lacked reasonable suspicion for the stop. But the district court credited the trooper's testimony that he believed Calvert illegally changed lanes. That finding is not clearly erroneous, and a traffic violation justifies a stop. See United States v. Bonilla, 86 F.4th 1196, 1198 (8th Cir. 2023) (reviewing factual findings for clear error); United States v. Hanel, 993 F.3d 540, 543 (8th Cir. 2021) ("Any traffic violation, however minor, provides probable cause for a traffic
stop.†(citation omitted)); United States v. Herrera-Gonzalez, 474 F.3d 1105, 1109 (8th Cir. 2007) (even an officer's mistaken belief that a violation occurred can justify a stop as long as the belief was objectively reasonable).
intent to distribute a controlled substance, 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(A)(viii).
Ray Calvert was driving a rental car when an Arkansas state trooper stopped him for illegal lane changes. While waiting for dispatch to run criminal history reports, the passenger who rented the car consented to a search. The trooper found-2-bundles of methamphetamine in the glove box.
Calvert argues that the stop was unconstitutional. He claims he didn't commit a traffic violation, so the trooper lacked reasonable suspicion for the stop. But the district court credited the trooper's testimony that he believed Calvert illegally changed lanes. That finding is not clearly erroneous, and a traffic violation justifies a stop. See United States v. Bonilla, 86 F.4th 1196, 1198 (8th Cir. 2023) (reviewing factual findings for clear error); United States v. Hanel, 993 F.3d 540, 543 (8th Cir. 2021) ("Any traffic violation, however minor, provides probable cause for a traffic
stop.†(citation omitted)); United States v. Herrera-Gonzalez, 474 F.3d 1105, 1109 (8th Cir. 2007) (even an officer's mistaken belief that a violation occurred can justify a stop as long as the belief was objectively reasonable).
Outcome:
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
About This Case
Which court heard United States of America v. Ray Cornelius Calvert?
This case was heard in United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas (Miller County), AR. The presiding judge was Susan O. Hickey.
Who were the attorneys in United States of America v. Ray Cornelius Calvert?
Plaintiff's attorney: United States District Attorney’s Office in Texarkana. Defendant's attorney: Click Here For The Best Texarkana Criminal Defense Law Lawyer Directory.
When was United States of America v. Ray Cornelius Calvert decided?
This case was decided on November 17, 2025.