Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
United States of America v. Joshua Eugene Gaines
Date: 09-10-2025
Case Number: 22-CR-165
Judge: Liles C. Burke
Court: United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama (Jefferson County)
Plaintiff's Attorney: United States District Attorney’s Office in Birmingham
Defendant's Attorney:
Click Here For The Best Birmingham Criminal Defense Law Lawyer Directory
Description:
Birmingham, Alabama criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with felony possession of a firearm.
After pleading guilty to a crime classified by Alabama law as
a Class D felony, Joshua Gaines was caught in possession of a fire-
arm. He was charged with and convicted of violating 18 U.S.C.
§ 922(g)(1)—colloquially, the federal "felon-in-possession†statute.
In November 2019, Joshua Gaines pleaded guilty in an Ala-
bama court to the crime of "receiving stolen property in the third
degree.†Gov't Trial Ex. 2, at 1, Dkt. No. 74-2 (citation modified).
Alabama law classifies that offense as a Class D felony. See Ala.
Code § 13A-8-18.1(b). Before pleading guilty, Gaines's lawyer told
him (and a state-provided "Explanation of Rights and Plea of
Guilty†form confirmed) that he would receive a "non-prison†sen-
tence of 13 to 31 months, suspended—meaning that it would be
deferred provided that he continued to satisfy his terms of proba-
tion. See Gov't Trial Ex. 2 at 4; Jury Trial Tr. II, at 260:16–22, Dkt.
No. 89.
Gaines appealed, arguing, as relevant here, that the government
had presented insufficient evidence to convict him and, therefore,
that the district court erred in refusing to grant his motion for judg-
ment of acquittal.
Gaines's lawyer was right. Given Gaines's criminal history,
the applicable law foreclosed a sentence that included any actual
prison time. Under Alabama law at the time, a Class D felony gen-
erally triggered a "definite term of imprisonment†of "not more
than 5 years or less than 1 year and 1 dayâ€â€”but, importantly, it also
mandated that any sentence be "in accordance with subsection (b)
of Section 15-18-8.†See Ala. Code § 13A-5-6(a)(4) (2019) (amended
2023). Section 15-18-8(b), in turn, barred judges from imposing
prison sentences on Class D felons who hadn't been convicted of
either (1) three or more felonies or (2) two or more serious felonies.
See Ala. Code § 15-18-8(b), (e) (2019) (amended 2023). Instead, for
those offenders, it required a sentence of "probation, drug court,
or a pretrial diversion program,†or confinement in "a consenting
community corrections program†for "a period not exceeding two
yearsâ€â€”or, if no community corrections program existed, in a
"high-intensity probation under the supervision of the Board of
Pardons and Paroles.†Id.
After pleading guilty, Gaines was given a 24-month sus-
pended sentence and was placed on probation for two years. Fol-
lowing his sentencing, Gaines signed a "Registration of Felonsâ€
form notifying him that, pursuant to the Federal Gun Control Act
of 1968, he couldn't possess a firearm.
Six months later, police officers stopped a car in which
Gaines was a passenger. The officers discovered a gun in the car,
and Gaines admitted that it was his. The officers arrested Gaines
and took him to jail.
After pleading guilty to a crime classified by Alabama law as
a Class D felony, Joshua Gaines was caught in possession of a fire-
arm. He was charged with and convicted of violating 18 U.S.C.
§ 922(g)(1)—colloquially, the federal "felon-in-possession†statute.
In November 2019, Joshua Gaines pleaded guilty in an Ala-
bama court to the crime of "receiving stolen property in the third
degree.†Gov't Trial Ex. 2, at 1, Dkt. No. 74-2 (citation modified).
Alabama law classifies that offense as a Class D felony. See Ala.
Code § 13A-8-18.1(b). Before pleading guilty, Gaines's lawyer told
him (and a state-provided "Explanation of Rights and Plea of
Guilty†form confirmed) that he would receive a "non-prison†sen-
tence of 13 to 31 months, suspended—meaning that it would be
deferred provided that he continued to satisfy his terms of proba-
tion. See Gov't Trial Ex. 2 at 4; Jury Trial Tr. II, at 260:16–22, Dkt.
No. 89.
Gaines appealed, arguing, as relevant here, that the government
had presented insufficient evidence to convict him and, therefore,
that the district court erred in refusing to grant his motion for judg-
ment of acquittal.
Gaines's lawyer was right. Given Gaines's criminal history,
the applicable law foreclosed a sentence that included any actual
prison time. Under Alabama law at the time, a Class D felony gen-
erally triggered a "definite term of imprisonment†of "not more
than 5 years or less than 1 year and 1 dayâ€â€”but, importantly, it also
mandated that any sentence be "in accordance with subsection (b)
of Section 15-18-8.†See Ala. Code § 13A-5-6(a)(4) (2019) (amended
2023). Section 15-18-8(b), in turn, barred judges from imposing
prison sentences on Class D felons who hadn't been convicted of
either (1) three or more felonies or (2) two or more serious felonies.
See Ala. Code § 15-18-8(b), (e) (2019) (amended 2023). Instead, for
those offenders, it required a sentence of "probation, drug court,
or a pretrial diversion program,†or confinement in "a consenting
community corrections program†for "a period not exceeding two
yearsâ€â€”or, if no community corrections program existed, in a
"high-intensity probation under the supervision of the Board of
Pardons and Paroles.†Id.
After pleading guilty, Gaines was given a 24-month sus-
pended sentence and was placed on probation for two years. Fol-
lowing his sentencing, Gaines signed a "Registration of Felonsâ€
form notifying him that, pursuant to the Federal Gun Control Act
of 1968, he couldn't possess a firearm.
Six months later, police officers stopped a car in which
Gaines was a passenger. The officers discovered a gun in the car,
and Gaines admitted that it was his. The officers arrested Gaines
and took him to jail.
Outcome:
Reversed
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
About This Case
What was the outcome of United States of America v. Joshua Eugene Gaines?
The outcome was: Reversed
Which court heard United States of America v. Joshua Eugene Gaines?
This case was heard in United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama (Jefferson County), AL. The presiding judge was Liles C. Burke.
Who were the attorneys in United States of America v. Joshua Eugene Gaines?
Plaintiff's attorney: United States District Attorney’s Office in Birmingham. Defendant's attorney: Click Here For The Best Birmingham Criminal Defense Law Lawyer Directory.
When was United States of America v. Joshua Eugene Gaines decided?
This case was decided on September 10, 2025.