Tuscaloosa, Alabama social security disability lawyers represented Plaintiff seeking review of the denial of her application for Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI benefits by HHS.
Outcome:
08/11/2023 21 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 8/10/2023. (KAM) (Entered: 08/11/2023)
08/11/2023 22 ORDER in accordance with the Memorandum Opinion entered this day, the Commissioner's final decision is AFFIREMED. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 8/10/2023. (KAM) (Entered: 08/11/2023)
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
Related Cases from United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama (Tuscaloosa County)
What was the outcome of LA. v. Social Security Administration?
The outcome was: 08/11/2023 21 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 8/10/2023. (KAM) (Entered: 08/11/2023)
08/11/2023 22 ORDER in accordance with the Memorandum Opinion entered this day, the Commissioner's final decision is AFFIREMED. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 8/10/2023. (KAM) (Entered: 08/11/2023)
Which court heard LA. v. Social Security Administration?
This case was heard in United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama (Tuscaloosa County), AL. The presiding judge was R David Proctor.
Who were the attorneys in LA. v. Social Security Administration?
Plaintiff's attorney: Click Here For The Best Tuscaloosa Social Security Disability Lawyer Directory. Defendant's attorney: Jack Hood.
When was LA. v. Social Security Administration decided?