Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Ramil Laureta v. Food Services of America, Inc.
Date: 07-09-2019
Case Number: 3:18-cv-00276-SLG
Judge: Sharon L. Gleason
Court: United States District Court for the District of Alaska (Anchorage)
Plaintiff's Attorney: Douglas G. Johnson
Defendant's Attorney: Cynthia L. Ducey
<a href="http://www.callmorelaw.com" target="_new">MoreLaw Virtual Receptionists</a></br><br>
<font Color="Red">Never Miss Another Call<br>
Don't Wait - Call 918-582-6422 Today!<br>
</font><br>
</h1><br>
<P><br>
</center><br>
Anchorage, AK - Ramil Laureta sued Food Services of America, Inc. on a personal injury negligence theory.<br>
<br>
Plaintiff filed suit in the Alaska Superior Court, Anchorage Borough, case no.: 3AN-18-10278CI, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.
07/09/2019 36 SLG TEXT ORDER: The parties' Stipulation of Dismissal 35 is APPROVED. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case; all pending motions are denied as moot. (CME, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 07/09/2019)
About This Case
What was the outcome of Ramil Laureta v. Food Services of America, Inc.?
The outcome was: 07/09/2019 35 STIPULATION of Dismissal (titled "Stipulation to Voluntarily Dismiss with Prejudice") by Food Services of America, Inc.. (Ducey, Cynthia) (Entered: 07/09/2019) 07/09/2019 36 SLG TEXT ORDER: The parties' Stipulation of Dismissal 35 is APPROVED. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case; all pending motions are denied as moot. (CME, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 07/09/2019)
Which court heard Ramil Laureta v. Food Services of America, Inc.?
This case was heard in United States District Court for the District of Alaska (Anchorage), AK. The presiding judge was Sharon L. Gleason.
Who were the attorneys in Ramil Laureta v. Food Services of America, Inc.?
Plaintiff's attorney: Douglas G. Johnson. Defendant's attorney: Cynthia L. Ducey.
When was Ramil Laureta v. Food Services of America, Inc. decided?
This case was decided on July 9, 2019.