Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

STATE OF OKLAHOMA, Plaintiff, v. CHRISTOPHER LEE HANGER, Defendant.

Date: 01-26-2020

Case Number: CF-2017-3370

Judge: Ray C. Elliott

Court: In the District Court in and for Oklahoma County, Oklahoma

Plaintiff's Attorney: David Prater's Office

Defendant's Attorney: Call 918-582-6422 for free help finding a criminal defense lawyer in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.

Description:
Oklahoma City, OK - The State of Oklahoma charged Christopher Lee Hanger with:





Count # 1. Count as Filed: DI1, DRIVING WHILE UNDER THE INFLUENCE, in violation of 47 O.S. 11-902(A)(2)

Date of Offense: 03/19/2017

Party Name Disposition Information

HANGER, CHRISTOPHER LEE Disposed: DISMISSED WITH COSTS, 01/23/2020. Dismissed with Costs

Count as Disposed: DRIVING WHILE UNDER THE INFLUENCE(DI1)

Violation of 47 O.S. 11-902(A)(2)

Count # 2. Count as Filed: DU8I, POSSESSION OF A CDS - MARIJUANA, in violation of 63 O.S. 2-401-2-420

Date of Offense: 03/19/2017

Party Name Disposition Information

HANGER, CHRISTOPHER LEE Disposed: DISMISSED WITH COSTS, 01/23/2020. Dismissed with Costs

Count as Disposed: POSSESSION OF A CDS - MARIJUANA(DU8I)

Violation of 63 O.S. 2-401-2-420
Outcome:
Dismissed
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of STATE OF OKLAHOMA, Plaintiff, v. CHRISTOPHER LEE HANGER, ...?

The outcome was: Dismissed

Which court heard STATE OF OKLAHOMA, Plaintiff, v. CHRISTOPHER LEE HANGER, ...?

This case was heard in In the District Court in and for Oklahoma County, Oklahoma. The presiding judge was Ray C. Elliott.

Who were the attorneys in STATE OF OKLAHOMA, Plaintiff, v. CHRISTOPHER LEE HANGER, ...?

Plaintiff's attorney: David Prater's Office. Defendant's attorney: Call 918-582-6422 for free help finding a criminal defense lawyer in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma..

When was STATE OF OKLAHOMA, Plaintiff, v. CHRISTOPHER LEE HANGER, ... decided?

This case was decided on January 26, 2020.