Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
In re Ryshan N.
Date: 02-14-2025
Case Number: AC47771
Judge: Prazzini
Court: Superior Court,, Hartford County, Connecticut
Plaintiff's Attorney: Connecticut Attorney General's Office
Defendant's Attorney:
Click Here For The Best Hartford Family Law Lawyer Directory
Description:
Hartford, Connecticut family law lawyer represented mother in a parental termination action.
Shortly after Ryshan's birth in February, 2022, he was adjudicated neglected and committed to the custody of the petitioner. The petitioner thereafter filed a petition to terminate the respondent's parental rights. On March 28, 2024, following a four day trial, the court issued a memorandum of decision in which it granted the petition to terminate the respondent's parental rights. The court found, by clear and convincing evidence, that the
respondent was unwilling or unable to benefit from efforts to reunify her with Ryshan. The court also found that the respondent had failed to rehabilitate in that she had unresolved issues with mental health, substance abuse and intimate partner violence, and that termination of the respondent's parental rights was in Ryshan's best interest.
* * *
Legal issue Did the trial court improperly infer that the respondent mother was under the influence of drugs during visitation, affecting the judgment to terminate her parental rights?
Headnote
FAMILY LAW. TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS. The court addressed whether the respondent mother failed to achieve personal rehabilitation to the extent that incarceration did not prevent her from assuming a responsible position in her child's life, justifying the termination of her parental rights under applicable state law.
FAMILY LAW. EVIDENCE AND INFERENCES. The case involved determining whether the trial court improperly inferred from the respondent's behavior during visitation with her child that she was under the influence of drugs, impacting the decision to terminate parental rights.
FAMILY LAW. BEST INTEREST OF THE CHILD. The judgment considered whether terminating the mother's parental rights served the best interest of the child, given the unresolved issues of mental health, substance abuse, and intimate partner violence.
Key Phrases Termination of parental rights. Personal rehabilitation. Substance abuse. Visitation supervision. Drowsy demeanor.
Shortly after Ryshan's birth in February, 2022, he was adjudicated neglected and committed to the custody of the petitioner. The petitioner thereafter filed a petition to terminate the respondent's parental rights. On March 28, 2024, following a four day trial, the court issued a memorandum of decision in which it granted the petition to terminate the respondent's parental rights. The court found, by clear and convincing evidence, that the
respondent was unwilling or unable to benefit from efforts to reunify her with Ryshan. The court also found that the respondent had failed to rehabilitate in that she had unresolved issues with mental health, substance abuse and intimate partner violence, and that termination of the respondent's parental rights was in Ryshan's best interest.
* * *
Legal issue Did the trial court improperly infer that the respondent mother was under the influence of drugs during visitation, affecting the judgment to terminate her parental rights?
Headnote
FAMILY LAW. TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS. The court addressed whether the respondent mother failed to achieve personal rehabilitation to the extent that incarceration did not prevent her from assuming a responsible position in her child's life, justifying the termination of her parental rights under applicable state law.
FAMILY LAW. EVIDENCE AND INFERENCES. The case involved determining whether the trial court improperly inferred from the respondent's behavior during visitation with her child that she was under the influence of drugs, impacting the decision to terminate parental rights.
FAMILY LAW. BEST INTEREST OF THE CHILD. The judgment considered whether terminating the mother's parental rights served the best interest of the child, given the unresolved issues of mental health, substance abuse, and intimate partner violence.
Key Phrases Termination of parental rights. Personal rehabilitation. Substance abuse. Visitation supervision. Drowsy demeanor.
Outcome:
Affirmed
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
About This Case
What was the outcome of In re Ryshan N.?
The outcome was: Affirmed
Which court heard In re Ryshan N.?
This case was heard in Superior Court,, Hartford County, Connecticut, CT. The presiding judge was Prazzini.
Who were the attorneys in In re Ryshan N.?
Plaintiff's attorney: Connecticut Attorney General's Office. Defendant's attorney: Click Here For The Best Hartford Family Law Lawyer Directory.
When was In re Ryshan N. decided?
This case was decided on February 14, 2025.