Verdict Search Results
Results
Showing 1 - 50 of 50072
United States of America v. Gryant Dewayne Underwood
Muskogee, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with felony possession of an unregistered firearm in violation of 26 U.S.C. 5845(a). Digested by <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/vendors/vendor.asp?f=Kent&l=Morlan&i=28729&z=74119&s=OK" target="_new">Kent Morlan</a> Bryant Underwood unsuccessfully sought to suppress the contents of a search initiated during a traffic stop, arguing the initial stop violated the Fourth Amendment. Late one night in October 202
View VerdictState of Oklahoma v. Amber Compher
Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represents the Defendant charged with sexual assault. Digested by <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/vendors/vendor.asp?f=Kent&l=Morlan&i=28729&z=74119&s=OK" target="_new">Kent Morlan</a>
View Verdict, State of Oklahoma v. Warren Robert Harker
Stillwater, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with: Count # 1. Count as Filed: DI1M, Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol, Second & Subsequent, in violation of 47 O.S. 11-902(C) Date of Offense: 04/05/2025 Party Name Disposition Information Harker, Warren Robert Disposed: DEFERRED, 05/20/2025. Guilty Plea Count as Disposed: Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Alcohol, Second & Subsequent(DI1M) Violation o
View VerdictState of Oklahoma v. Lon Brandon Meeks
Durant, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with violation of a protective order. Digested by <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/vendors/vendor.asp?f=Kent&l=Morlan&i=28729&z=74119&s=OK" target="_new">Kent Morlan</a> This case involves a nearly 40-minute YouTube video posted by Meeks in May 2023 that was forwarded to his ex-wife by her boss. 2 According to his ex-wife, she and Meeks separated in 2018, divorced in 2019, and Meeks voluntarily terminated his paren
View VerdictState of Oklahoma v.
Bristow, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with reckless conduct with a firearm (reduced to a felony feloniously pointing a firearm) and assault and battery. Digested by <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/vendors/vendor.asp?f=Kent&l=Morlan&i=28729&z=74119&s=OK" target="_new">Kent Morlan</a>
View VerdictState of Oklahoma v. Bret Mihcael West M.h2>
Sapulpa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with assault and battery with a dangerous weapon, domestic abuse, threatening to perform as act of violence, and petit larceny. Digested by <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/vendors/vendor.asp?f=Kent&l=Morlan&i=28729&z=74119&s=OK" target="_new">Kent Morlan</a>
View VerdictState of Oklahoma v.
Vinita, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with possession of a firearm after former conviction of a felony (AFCF). Digested by <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/vendors/vendor.asp?f=Kent&l=Morlan&i=28729&z=74119&s=OK" target="_new">Kent Morlan</a> The Defendant claimed to be Native American and a member of the Delaware Tribe.
View VerdictState of Oklahoma v. Robert Joe Gooden, Jr.
Walters, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with second degree burglary punishable by up to 10 years in prison.
View VerdictState of Oklahoma v. Justin Doe Smith
Lawton, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with driving a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol second and subsequent offense in violation of 47 O.S. 11-0-2-(A)(2) and operating a motor vehicle in defective condition or unsafe conditions in violation of 47 O.S. 12-101. Digested by <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/vendors/vendor.asp?f=Kent&l=Morlan&i=28729&z=74119&s=OK" target="_new">Kent Morlan</a>
View VerdictState of Oklahoma v. Shelley Sue Clegg
Boise City, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with unlawful possession of scheduled 1 drug with intent to distribute, endeavoring or conspiring to manufacture and/or deliver drugs, possession of CDS without a tax stamp, unlawful possession of drugs, and unlawful possession of paraphernalia. Digested by <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/vendors/vendor.asp?f=Kent&l=Morlan&i=28729&z=74119&s=OK" target="_new">Kent Morlan</a>
View VerdictState of Oklahoma v. Xochitl Moreno-Salas
Tahlequah, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with kidnappin, first degree burglary, possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony, and malicious injury to property. Digested by <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/vendors/vendor.asp?f=Kent&l=Morlan&i=28729&z=74119&s=OK" target="_new">Kent Morlan</a>
View VerdictState of Okalhoma v. Shamar Montella Maytubby
Ardmore, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with possession of a firearm after former conviction of a felony and unlawful possession of drugs. Digested by <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/vendors/vendor.asp?f=Kent&l=Morlan&i=28729&z=74119&s=OK" target="_new">Kent Morlan</a>
View VerdictState of Oklahoma v. Desmond Ray Daniels
Watonga, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with assault and battery, a misdemeanor (reduced to domestic assault and battery in the presence of a child._ Digested by <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/vendors/vendor.asp?f=Kent&l=Morlan&i=28729&z=74119&s=OK" target="_new">Kent Morlan</a>
View VerdictState of Oklahoma v. R.L.D.
Sayre, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with domestic assault and battery by strangulation. Digested by <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/vendors/vendor.asp?f=Kent&l=Morlan&i=28729&z=74119&s=OK" target="_new">Kent Morlan</a>
View VerdictState of Oklahoma v. Jeremy Dashaun Jones
Cherokee, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with unlawful entry into a prison, bringing contraband in to a penal institution, and conspiracy. Digested by <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/vendors/vendor.asp?f=Kent&l=Morlan&i=28729&z=74119&s=OK" target="_new">Kent Morlan</a> The Defendant allegedly threatened Nautica Jones and Kaedyn Bagby with a gun.
View VerdictState of Oklahoma v. Diana Netro
Stilwell, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with cruelty to animals. Digested by <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/vendors/vendor.asp?f=Kent&l=Morlan&i=28729&z=74119&s=OK" target="_new">Kent Morlan</a>
View VerdictState of Oklahoma v. Popey Lee Nolan
Sapulpa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represents the Defendant charged with first degree murder and possession of a firearm after former conviction of a felonly (AFCF). Digested by <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/vendors/vendor.asp?f=Kent&l=Morlan&i=28729&z=74119&s=OK" target="_new">Kent Morlan</a> Popeye Lee Nolan, ate 24, was arrested on January 6th. The victim, Christo;pher Pennington, was shot in the head.
View VerdictTerrence Clancy and Deborah Clancy v. CSAA fire and Casualty Insurance Company, Mill Ave, Inc. d/b/a Servpro of South Tulsa County
Tulsa, Oklahoma, personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued for the damages and injuries they suffered as a direct result of their home being destroyed on August 27, 2017, by an explosion. Digested by <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/vendors/vendor.asp?f=Kent&l=Morlan&i=28729&z=74119&s=OK" target="_new">Kent Morlan</a>
View VerdictKadrain Taylor v. Masen Neifing
Norman, Oklahoma, personal injury lawyer represented the Defendant on a car wreck claim. Digested by <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/vendors/vendor.asp?f=Kent&l=Morlan&i=28729&z=74119&s=OK" target="_new">Kent Morlan</a> The Plaintiff claimed that she was injured and damaged as a direct result of a collision caused by the Defendant's failure to exercise due care.
View VerdictLynette Saavedra v. Winco Foods, Inc.
Norman, Oklahoma, personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff on a premises liability negligence theory claiming to have been injured and/or damaged as a direct result of a dangerous condition on the Defendant's property. Digested by <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/vendors/vendor.asp?f=Kent&l=Morlan&i=28729&z=74119&s=OK" target="_new">Kent Morlan</a>
View VerdictNorman, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiffs on a negligent damage to property theory. Digested by <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/vendors/vendor.asp?f=Kent&l=Morlan&i=28729&z=74119&s=OK" target="_new">Kent Morlan</a> The Plaintiffs claimed that construction on a swimming pool and the Ward property damaged their property.
View VerdictBoston B. Williams v. State of Oklahoma, et al. Service Oklahoma
Norman, Oklahoma, civil litigation lawyer represented the Petitioner seeking reversal of a driving revocation order issued by Service Oklahoma. The Petitioner alleged that the revocation of his driver's license created an extreme and unusual hardship on the Petitioner and, as a result, he has no other adquate means of transportation and violates the requirements for revocation set forth in statues and exigent case law.
View VerdictGage Austin Reust v. State of oklahoma, ex rel Service Oklahoma
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, civil litigation lawyer represented the Plaintiff whose driving privileges were removed by Service Oklahoma after convicting of a DUI. The Plaintiff claimed that the requirement that he install a mandatory ignition interlock program called IDAP but the requirement is so punitive in nature that it violates Double Jeopardy protections in the United States and Oklahoma Constitutions.
View VerdictMidland Credit Management, Inc. v. J.S.S.
Stilwell, Oklahoma, debtor-creditor lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant to collect a debt. Digested by <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/vendors/vendor.asp?f=Kent&l=Morlan&i=28729&z=74119&s=OK" target="_new">Kent Morlan</a>
View VerdictJeffrey Lynn Smith v. State of Oklahoma, ex rel Service Oklahoma
Stilwell, Oklahoma, civil litigation lawyer represented the Plaintiff appealing the receipt of a revocation of driving privileges from Service Oklahoma. The action was brought pursuant to 47 O.S. 6-211 and 754. Plaintiff claimed that the revocation and/or disqualification is done without legal authority and without proper notice to the Plaintiff. Further, it is an arbitrary, frivolous, and capricious act and without justification or reasonable basis, and therefore said revocation should b
View VerdictBrent Cameron Soldier v. State of Oklahoma
Stilwell, Oklahoma, civil litigation lawyer represented the Plaintiff claiming that Service Oklahoma does not have the authority to revoke Plaintiff's driving privileges because the requirement to install a mandatory ignition interlock program called an IDAP is so punitive in nature that it violates the Double Jeopardy progection of both the United States and Oklahoma Constitutions. 47 O.S. § 6-211 (OSCN 2026) A. Any person denied driving privileges, or whose driving privilege has been ca
View VerdictMh2> State of Oklahoma v.
Pawhuska, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with malicious injury or destruction of property (amended to from malicious injury to property over $1,000).
View VerdictState of Oklahoma v. Bronson D. Roberts
Pawhuska, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with driving a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol aggravated and operating a vehicle at a speed greater than reasonable and property. Digested by: <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/vendors/vendor.asp?f=Kent&l=Morlan&i=28729&z=74119&s=OK" target="_new">Kent Morlan</a>
View VerdictState of Oklahoma v.
Pawhuska, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with two counts of assault and battery with a dangerous weapons. Digested by: <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/vendors/vendor.asp?f=Kent&l=Morlan&i=28729&z=74119&s=OK" target="_new">Kent Morlan</a>
View VerdictState of Oklahoma v. William Alexander English
Pawhuska, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with misdemeanor eluding (reduced from endangering others while attempting to elude a police officer and driving let of center> Digested by: <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/vendors/vendor.asp?f=Kent&l=Morlan&i=28729&z=74119&s=OK" target="_new">Kent Morlan</a>
View VerdictState of Oklahoma v. Stephen Lawrence Taylor
Pawhuska, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with driving a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol aggravated and transporting an open container of intoxicating beverage. Digested by: <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/vendors/vendor.asp?f=Kent&l=Morlan&i=28729&z=74119&s=OK" target="_new">Kent Morlan</a>
View VerdictState of Oklahoma v. Shanon James Hall
Pawhuska, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represents the Defendant charged with: 1. DRIVING A MOTOR VEHICLE WHILE UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF ALCOHOL 2. UNSAFE LANE USE 3. FAILURE TO WEAR SEATBELT Digested by: <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/vendors/vendor.asp?f=Kent&l=Morlan&i=28729&z=74119&s=OK" target="_new">Kent Morlan</a>
View VerdictState of Oklahoma v. Clarissa Joyce Steele
Pawhuska, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with larceny of lost property. Digested by: <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/vendors/vendor.asp?f=Kent&l=Morlan&i=28729&z=74119&s=OK" target="_new">Kent Morlan</a>
View VerdictState of Oklahoma v. Philip Oscar Anderson
Pawhuska, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with: 1. DRIVING A MOTOR VEHICLE WHILE UNDER THE INFLUENCE DRUGS AGGRAVATED (MARIJUANA) (B3) 2. POSSESSION OF CONTROLLED DANGEROUS SUBSTANCE (MARIJUANA) 3. FAILURE TO WEAR SEATBELT
View VerdictState of Oklahoma v. Jenny Palacios
Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represents the Defendant charged with embezzlement. Digested by: <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/vendors/vendor.asp?f=Kent&l=Morlan&i=28729&z=74119&s=OK" target="_new">Kent Morlan</a> Jenny Palacios, an employee who worked at a café at Saint Francis in Tulsa is accused of stealing more than $130,000 from the business by using fraudulent void transactions over several years. She allegedly used void transactions allowing her to take cash from the ca
View VerdictState of Oklahoma v. Benjamin Jacob Hager
Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer <a href='https://www.morelaw.com/lawyers/30353/robbi-barker/' target="_new">Robbi Barker</a> represented the Defendant charged with embezzlement in excess of $1,000 in violation of 21 O.S. 1451.A.2. Digested by: <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/vendors/vendor.asp?f=Kent&l=Morlan&i=28729&z=74119&s=OK" target="_new">Kent Morlan</a>
View VerdictState of Oklahoma v. L.N.G.
Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyers <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/lawyers/118660/m-j-denman/" target="_new">M.J. Denman</a> and Ed Lutz represented the Defendant charged with feloniously pointing a firearm in violation of 21 O.S. 1289.16, and threatening an act of violence in violation of 21 O.S. 1378. Digested by: <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/vendors/vendor.asp?f=Kent&l=Morlan&i=28729&z=74119&s=OK" target="_new">Kent Morlan</a>
View VerdictState of Oklahoma v. Kyle Westin Bayless
Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the defendant charged with falsely impersonating another to create liability in violation of 21 o.S. 1531(4). Digested by: <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/vendors/vendor.asp?f=Kent&l=Morlan&i=28729&z=74119&s=OK" target="_new">Kent Morlan</a>
View VerdictState of Oklahoma v. Wendy Michele Cryingwolf
Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with unlawful possession of controlled drug with intent to distribute in violation of 63 O.S. 2-401.B2; acquiring proceeds of drug activity in violation of 63 O.S. 2-503.1A; and possession of controlled drug without a tax stamp in violation of 68 O.S. 450.8. Digested by: <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/vendors/vendor.asp?f=Kent&l=Morlan&i=28729&z=74119&s=OK" target="_new">Kent Morlan</a>
View VerdictState of Oklahoma v. D.M.S.
Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/lawyers/57282/michael-french/" target="_new">Michael French</a> represented the Defendant charged with larceny of lost property in violation of 21 O.S. 1702.2. Digested by: <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/vendors/vendor.asp?f=Kent&l=Morlan&i=28729&z=74119&s=OK" target="_new">Kent Morlan</a>
View VerdictState of Oklahoma v. Chandler Daniel Rhodes
Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represents the Defendant charged with first-degree burglary in violation of 21 O.S. 1431 and carrying a firearm while under the influence of drugs or alcohol in violation of 21 O.S. 1289.9. Digested by: <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/vendors/vendor.asp?f=Kent&l=Morlan&i=28729&z=74119&s=OK" target="_new">Kent Morlan</a>
View VerdictState of Oklahoma v. Ryan Andrew Hall
Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with aggravated DUI alcohol in violation of 47 O.S. 11-902-D. Digested by: <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/vendors/vendor.asp?f=Kent&l=Morlan&i=28729&z=74119&s=OK" target="_new">Kent Morlan</a>
View VerdictState of Oklahoma v. Terrence Gregory Smith
Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with possession of a firearm AFCF in violation of 21 O.S. 1283, unlawful possession of marijuana in violation of 63 O.S. 2-402(A)(1). and driving with license suspended or revoked in violation of 47 O.S. 6-303(B), and failure to carry insurance verification in violation of 47 O.S. 7-606. Digested by: <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/vendors/vendor.asp?f=Kent&l=Morlan&i=28729&z=74119&s=OK" target="_new">Kent Morlan</a>
View VerdictState of Oklahoma v. Thomas Malarson Branson
Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with robbery with a dangerous weapon in violation of 21 O.S. 801, assault and battery upon a police officer in violation of 21 O.S. 649, and assault
View VerdictState of Oklahoma v. Rondrey Deon Pearson
Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with possession of a firearm AFCF in violation of 21 O.S. 1283 and receiving and/or concealing stolen property in violation of 21 O.S. 1713. Digested by: <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/vendors/vendor.asp?f=Kent&l=Morlan&i=28729&z=74119&s=OK" target="_new">Kent Morlan</a>
View VerdictState of Oklahoma v. Daniel Lee Hubbard
Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/morelawadmin/atty.php?action=edit&id=119220" target="_new">Jon Nation</a> represented the Defendant charged with embezzlement by employee in violation of 21 O.S. 1451.A. Digested by: <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/vendors/vendor.asp?f=Kent&l=Morlan&i=28729&z=74119&s=OK" target="_new">Kent Morlan</a>
View VerdictState of Oklahoma v. E.T.
Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with stalking in violation of 21 O.S. 1173. Digested by: <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/vendors/vendor.asp?f=Kent&l=Morlan&i=28729&z=74119&s=OK" target="_new">Kent Morlan</a>
View VerdictState of California v. Michael Ross Kettles
Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with bring in or possessing contraband in a jail or penal institution in violation of 57 O.S. 21 (A) and assault and battery on a detention officer in violation of 21 O.S. 649.B. Digested by: <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/vendors/vendor.asp?f=Kent&l=Morlan&i=28729&z=74119&s=OK" target="_new">Kent Morlan</a>
View VerdictState of Oklahoma v. Michael Ross Kettles
Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with uttering a forged instrument in violation of 21 O.S. 1592 and knowingly receiving stolen property in violation of 21 O.S. 1713. Digested by: <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/vendors/vendor.asp?f=Kent&l=Morlan&i=28729&z=74119&s=OK" target="_new">Kent Morlan</a>
View VerdictState of Oklahoma v. Warren Harding Dean
Muskogee, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Possession of a Controlled Dangerous Substance (Marijuana) in a Penal Institution. Digested by: <a href="https://www.morelaw.com/vendors/vendor.asp?f=Kent&l=Morlan&i=28729&z=74119&s=OK" target="_new">Kent Morlan</a> Appellant was an inmate at Jess Dunn Correctional Center when he was discovered to be in possession of a baggie containing approximately ten (10) grams of marijuana. Appellant was charged with p
View Verdict| >> next >> |