Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

PUR Water, et al. v. The Brita Products, et al.

Date: 10-01-2001

Case Number: 99-CV-749

Judge: Paul A. Magnuson

Court: United States District Court for the District of Minnesota

Plaintiff's Attorney: J. Thomas Vitt, Peter McCreery Lancaster, and Kenneth E. Levitt of Dorsey & Whitney, Minneapolis, Minnesota

Defendant's Attorney: Cary Bryan Johnson, Jacob M. Holdreith, and Bridget A. Sullivan of Oppenheimer Wolff & Donnelly, Minneapolis, Minnesota and Michael M. Carlson, Gerald P. Dodson, Kenneth A. Kuwayti, Robert L. McKague, Marc J. Pernick, Paul H. Goldstein and Erik J. Olson of Morrison & Foerster, Palo Alto, California

Description:
Patent Infringement - Plaintiff claimed that filter replacement indicator for Brita's pour-through system infringed a patent owned by Procter & Gamble.
Outcome:
Defendant's verdict.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Unknown
Defendant's Experts:
Unknown
Comments:
None

About This Case

What was the outcome of PUR Water, et al. v. The Brita Products, et al.?

The outcome was: Defendant's verdict.

Which court heard PUR Water, et al. v. The Brita Products, et al.?

This case was heard in United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, MN. The presiding judge was Paul A. Magnuson.

Who were the attorneys in PUR Water, et al. v. The Brita Products, et al.?

Plaintiff's attorney: J. Thomas Vitt, Peter McCreery Lancaster, and Kenneth E. Levitt of Dorsey & Whitney, Minneapolis, Minnesota. Defendant's attorney: Cary Bryan Johnson, Jacob M. Holdreith, and Bridget A. Sullivan of Oppenheimer Wolff & Donnelly, Minneapolis, Minnesota and Michael M. Carlson, Gerald P. Dodson, Kenneth A. Kuwayti, Robert L. McKague, Marc J. Pernick, Paul H. Goldstein and Erik J. Olson of Morrison & Foerster, Palo Alto, California.

When was PUR Water, et al. v. The Brita Products, et al. decided?

This case was decided on October 1, 2001.