Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Decade Industries, d/b/a Sanus Systems v. Wood Technology
Date: 06-21-2000
Case Number: 99-1652
Judge: Doty
Court: United States District Court for the District of Minnesota
Plaintiff's Attorney: David R. Fairbairn and Michael J. Pape of Kinney & Lange, Minneapolis, Minnesota
Defendant's Attorney: Donald S. Arbour, Arbour Law Office, and Marlcohm E. Whittaker of Mineo Whittaker, Charlotte, North Carolina
On April 23, 1998, Sanus field a design application with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office which issues a notice of allowance and issued a patent on February 23, 1999.
In January 1999 at the Consumer Electronics Show, Sanus notice that Wood was displaying a stand for a mini stereo system which appeared to be a near duplicate of the Sanus system. Sanus filed suit claiming that the Wood system was essentially a duplicate of the Sanus system.
Reported by Kent Morlan
About This Case
What was the outcome of Decade Industries, d/b/a Sanus Systems v. Wood Technology?
The outcome was: Preliminary injunction in favor of Sanus.
Which court heard Decade Industries, d/b/a Sanus Systems v. Wood Technology?
This case was heard in United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, MN. The presiding judge was Doty.
Who were the attorneys in Decade Industries, d/b/a Sanus Systems v. Wood Technology?
Plaintiff's attorney: David R. Fairbairn and Michael J. Pape of Kinney & Lange, Minneapolis, Minnesota. Defendant's attorney: Donald S. Arbour, Arbour Law Office, and Marlcohm E. Whittaker of Mineo Whittaker, Charlotte, North Carolina.
When was Decade Industries, d/b/a Sanus Systems v. Wood Technology decided?
This case was decided on June 21, 2000.