Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

CD Solutions, Inc. v. John Cleven Tooker, Commercial Printing Co. an CDS Networks, Inc.

Date: 04-22-1998

Case Number: 97-cv-793

Judge: Ancer L. Haggerty

Court: United States District Court for the District of Oregon

Plaintiff's Attorney: David P. Petermen and
James E. Geringer of
Klarquist, Sparkman, Campbell, Leigh & Whinston, L.L.P., Portland, Oregon, and
D. Scott Hemingway of Sidley & Austin, Dallas, Texas.

Defendant's Attorney: Regina Hauser of Allyson, Krueger, Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt, Portland, Oregon

Description:
Declaratory judgment action brought to resolve a dispute over the use of http://www.cds.com. Plaintiff, CD Solutions registered "cds.com" with Network Solutions, Inc., as a "domain name" on the Internet. After plaintiff began using the domain dame to conduct business on the Internet, defendants advised plaintiff of their trademark and requested that plaintiff transfer the name cds.com to defendants. Plaintiff filled suit seeking a declaratory judgment establishing its right to use "cds.com" in its business.


Unlike a patent or copyright, a trademark does not confer on its owner any rights. There is no prohibition against the use of trademarks or service marks as domain names. Only used that infringe or dilute an owner's trademark or service mark are prohibited.


Defendants business pretained to providing commercial document services. Defendant did not expand the scope of its mark to include software. Both parties did, however, market themselves through the Internet.

Outcome:
The court concluded that defendants could not expend their trademark rights to generic descriptions existing in everyday language and sustained plaintiff's motion for summary judgment.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Unknown
Defendant's Experts:
Unknown
Comments:
For more information about this case, see: 15 F.Supp.2d 986 (D.Or. 1998).

About This Case

What was the outcome of CD Solutions, Inc. v. John Cleven Tooker, Commercial Prin...?

The outcome was: The court concluded that defendants could not expend their trademark rights to generic descriptions existing in everyday language and sustained plaintiff's motion for summary judgment.

Which court heard CD Solutions, Inc. v. John Cleven Tooker, Commercial Prin...?

This case was heard in United States District Court for the District of Oregon, OR. The presiding judge was Ancer L. Haggerty.

Who were the attorneys in CD Solutions, Inc. v. John Cleven Tooker, Commercial Prin...?

Plaintiff's attorney: David P. Petermen and James E. Geringer of Klarquist, Sparkman, Campbell, Leigh & Whinston, L.L.P., Portland, Oregon, and D. Scott Hemingway of Sidley & Austin, Dallas, Texas.. Defendant's attorney: Regina Hauser of Allyson, Krueger, Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt, Portland, Oregon.

When was CD Solutions, Inc. v. John Cleven Tooker, Commercial Prin... decided?

This case was decided on April 22, 1998.