Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Unidynamics Corporation d/b/a Crane National Vendors v. Automatic Produscts Internation, LTD. and Gross-Given Manufacturing Company, Inc.
Date: 09-18-1998
Case Number: 97-1322 to 97-1324 and 97-1375
Judge: Catherine D. Perry
Court: United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Plaintiff's Attorney: William E. Lahey of
Senniger, Powers, Leavitt & Roedel, St. Louis, Missouri
Defendant's Attorney: J. Derek Vandenburgh and
Mershant, Gould, Smith, Edell,
Welter & Schmidt, P.A., Minneapolis, Minnesota and Kevin M. Abel of
Bryan Cave, L.L.P., St. Louis, Missouri
About This Case
What was the outcome of Unidynamics Corporation d/b/a Crane National Vendors v. A...?
The outcome was: Summary judgment for Unidynamics holding that, as a matter of law, the LCM4 vending machines of Automatic products International, Ltd., and Gross-Given Manufacturing Company, Inc., do not infringe Unidynamics U.S. Patent 4,730,750 on a vending machine for dispensing refrigerated and unrefrigerated foods.
Which court heard Unidynamics Corporation d/b/a Crane National Vendors v. A...?
This case was heard in United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri, MO. The presiding judge was Catherine D. Perry.
Who were the attorneys in Unidynamics Corporation d/b/a Crane National Vendors v. A...?
Plaintiff's attorney: William E. Lahey of Senniger, Powers, Leavitt & Roedel, St. Louis, Missouri. Defendant's attorney: J. Derek Vandenburgh and Mershant, Gould, Smith, Edell, Welter & Schmidt, P.A., Minneapolis, Minnesota and Kevin M. Abel of Bryan Cave, L.L.P., St. Louis, Missouri.
When was Unidynamics Corporation d/b/a Crane National Vendors v. A... decided?
This case was decided on September 18, 1998.