Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Charles E. Emmenegger, et al. v. Bull Moose Tube Company, et al.

Date: 07-20-1998

Case Number: 96CV1095

Judge: Perry

Court: United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - Eastern Division

Plaintiff's Attorney: David W. Harlan and Melanie R. King of
Gallop and Johnson, St. Louis, Missouri

Defendant's Attorney: James R. Dankenbring, Francis E. Pennington, III, Thomas W. Jerry, and Francis X. Neuner, Jr. of Dankenbring and Greiman, Clayton, Missouri

Description:
Retaliatory discharge, severance pay and other claims by highly compensated
executives who sued their former employer and its owner for ERISA benefits allegedly due them under a phantom
stock plan. All three plaintiffs claimed that they were discharged in retaliation
for exercising their rights under the plan. They sought benefits under the plan
based on the "redemption value," as opposed to the much-lower "book value," of their phantom
shares; two plaintiff also sought severance pay benefits. Defendants
contended that plaintiffs were terminated for various acts of negligence
and misconduct and therefore were entitled to no more than book value
under the plan.
Outcome:
Judgment in favor of plaintiffs on all counts.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Unknown
Defendant's Experts:
Unknown
Comments:
For more information about this case, see: 13 F.Supp.2d 980 (E.D.Mo. 1998).

About This Case

What was the outcome of Charles E. Emmenegger, et al. v. Bull Moose Tube Company,...?

The outcome was: Judgment in favor of plaintiffs on all counts.

Which court heard Charles E. Emmenegger, et al. v. Bull Moose Tube Company,...?

This case was heard in United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - Eastern Division, MO. The presiding judge was Perry.

Who were the attorneys in Charles E. Emmenegger, et al. v. Bull Moose Tube Company,...?

Plaintiff's attorney: David W. Harlan and Melanie R. King of Gallop and Johnson, St. Louis, Missouri. Defendant's attorney: James R. Dankenbring, Francis E. Pennington, III, Thomas W. Jerry, and Francis X. Neuner, Jr. of Dankenbring and Greiman, Clayton, Missouri.

When was Charles E. Emmenegger, et al. v. Bull Moose Tube Company,... decided?

This case was decided on July 20, 1998.