Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Dorothy Lynn Campbell, et al. v. Burt Toyota-Diahatsu, Inc.

Date: 09-07-1999

Case Number: 95CV315 ; 97CA1123

Judge: James F. Macrum, Jr.

Court: District Court, Arapahoe County, Colorado

Plaintiff's Attorney: Richard K. Rufner of Law Offices of Richard K. Rufner, Englewood, Colorado and
Jersey M. Green of Preeo, Silverman & Green, P.C., Denver, Colorado

Defendant's Attorney: James M. Dieterich of White and Steele, P.C., Denver, Colorado,

Description:
Wrongful Death - Seat Belt - The Campbells owned a 1983 Toyota automobile (not purchased
from Burt) in which the retractor mechanism in the driver's
seatbelt had ceased to function in 1989. This caused excess slack
from the seatbelt to remain loose and rest on the lap of the
driver. David Campbell determined that he could not fix the
mechanism, so Dorothy Campbell modified the seatbelt by folding
and securing the slack with a clip from a child car safety seat
she had purchased (not from Burt or Toyota).



The Campbells brought the car to Burt's repair shop in 1992
for unrelated repairs and inquired into the repair of the
seatbelt. Evidence was presented that they were told that, to
have the retractor function properly, it would have to be
replaced. The Campbells declined to have the driver's seatbelt
replaced.



The seatbelt was never repaired, and ultimately David
Campbell died July 7, 1993, as a result of injuries he sustained
in an automobile collision in which he was wearing the seatbelt
in its modified condition.



Plaintiffs settled with the other people involved in the
collision and subsequently brought this lawsuit against Burt. At
trial, Burt moved for a directed verdict at the close of plaintiffs'
evidence and again at the close of all evidence. The trial court
denied both motions.



Burt contends that it owed no duty to warn David Campbell
regarding the safety hazard of the modified seatbelt and that the
trial court erred in denying its motions for directed verdict.

Outcome:
Verdict for the plaintiff for an unknown amount
Plaintiff's Experts:
Unknown
Defendant's Experts:
Unknown
Comments:
Reversed and remanded with directions to vacate by the Court of Appeals of Colorado. See: 983 P.2d 95 (Colo. App. December 24, 1998). Note: The above date reflects the appellate court decision date, not the original trial date. Reported by kkm.

About This Case

What was the outcome of Dorothy Lynn Campbell, et al. v. Burt Toyota-Diahatsu, Inc.?

The outcome was: Verdict for the plaintiff for an unknown amount

Which court heard Dorothy Lynn Campbell, et al. v. Burt Toyota-Diahatsu, Inc.?

This case was heard in District Court, Arapahoe County, Colorado, CO. The presiding judge was James F. Macrum, Jr..

Who were the attorneys in Dorothy Lynn Campbell, et al. v. Burt Toyota-Diahatsu, Inc.?

Plaintiff's attorney: Richard K. Rufner of Law Offices of Richard K. Rufner, Englewood, Colorado and Jersey M. Green of Preeo, Silverman & Green, P.C., Denver, Colorado. Defendant's attorney: James M. Dieterich of White and Steele, P.C., Denver, Colorado,.

When was Dorothy Lynn Campbell, et al. v. Burt Toyota-Diahatsu, Inc. decided?

This case was decided on September 7, 1999.