Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

United States of America v. Enerva W. Trotman, a/k/a Charles Carlos Clark

Date: 08-22-2025

Case Number: 91-cr-00092

Judge: Richard E. Myers, II

Court: United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina (Wake County)

Plaintiff's Attorney: United States District Attorney’s Office in Raleigh

Defendant's Attorney:

Click Here For The Best * Criminal Defense Law Lawyer Directory





Description:
Raleigh, North Carolina criminal defense lawyers represented the Defendant seeking compassionate release under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(1)(A).



(c) Modification of an Imposed Term of Imprisonment.—The court may not modify a term of imprisonment once it has been imposed except that—

(1) in any case—

(A) the court, upon motion of the Director of the Bureau of Prisons, or upon motion of the defendant after the defendant has fully exhausted all administrative rights to appeal a failure of the Bureau of Prisons to bring a motion on the defendant's behalf or the lapse of 30 days from the receipt of such a request by the warden of the defendant's facility, whichever is earlier, may reduce the term of imprisonment (and may impose a term of probation or supervised release with or without conditions that does not exceed the unserved portion of the original term of imprisonment), after considering the factors set forth in section 3553(a) to the extent that they are applicable, if it finds that—

(i) extraordinary and compelling reasons warrant such a reduction; or

(ii) the defendant is at least 70 years of age, has served at least 30 years in prison, pursuant to a sentence imposed under section 3559(c), for the offense or offenses for which the defendant is currently imprisoned, and a determination has been made by the Director of the Bureau of Prisons that the defendant is not a danger to the safety of any other person or the community, as provided under section 3142(g);

and that such a reduction is consistent with applicable policy statements issued by the Sentencing Commission; and

(B) the court may modify an imposed term of imprisonment to the extent otherwise expressly permitted by statute or by Rule 35 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure; and

(2) in the case of a defendant who has been sentenced to a term of imprisonment based on a sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered by the Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 994(o), upon motion of the defendant or the Director of the Bureau of Prisons, or on its own motion, the court may reduce the term of imprisonment, after considering the factors set forth in section 3553(a) to the extent that they are applicable, if such a reduction is consistent with applicable policy statements issued by the Sentencing Commission.





See: United States v. Trotman, No. 4:91-cr-00092-M-1 (E.D.N.C. Feb. 11, 2025).

Outcome:
Affirmed
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of United States of America v. Enerva W. Trotman, a/k/a Char...?

The outcome was: Affirmed

Which court heard United States of America v. Enerva W. Trotman, a/k/a Char...?

This case was heard in United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina (Wake County), NC. The presiding judge was Richard E. Myers, II.

Who were the attorneys in United States of America v. Enerva W. Trotman, a/k/a Char...?

Plaintiff's attorney: United States District Attorney’s Office in Raleigh. Defendant's attorney: Click Here For The Best * Criminal Defense Law Lawyer Directory.

When was United States of America v. Enerva W. Trotman, a/k/a Char... decided?

This case was decided on August 22, 2025.