Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

M.I.A.W. v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.

Date: 06-23-2025

Case Number: 87700

Judge: Jasmin D. Lilly-Spells

Court: Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County, Nevada

Plaintiff's Attorney: <a href="http://www.morelaw.com/lawyers/atty.asp?f=Brock&l=Ohlson&i=150108&z=89107" target="_new">Brock Ohlson</a>, <a href="http://www.morelaw.com/lawyers/atty.asp?f=Justin&l=Corne&i=150106&z=89107" target+"_new">Justin Corne</a> and <a href="http://www.morelaw.com/lawyers/atty.asp?f=Caitlan&l=Lorell&i=150107&z=89107" target="_new">Caitlin Lorell</a>

Defendant's Attorney: Diana Clineand Teresa Beck

Description:
Las Vegas, Nevada personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff on a bus negligence claim.



While pregnant with M.W., Rose was traveling to Las Vegas. During her journey, she boarded a coach bus operated by Greyhound Lines, Inc., in California. Another Greyhound passenger shot multiple people on the bus, including Rose. As a result of Rose's injuries, M.W. was experiencing fetal heart failure, so doctors performed an emergency C-section. Since being delivered prematurely, M.W. has required near constant medical supervision. M.W.'s father filed the underlying negligence action against Greyhound on M.W.'s behalf.
Outcome:
Motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction granted.



Affirmed
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of M.I.A.W. v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.?

The outcome was: Motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction granted. Affirmed

Which court heard M.I.A.W. v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.?

This case was heard in Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County, Nevada, NV. The presiding judge was Jasmin D. Lilly-Spells.

Who were the attorneys in M.I.A.W. v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.?

Plaintiff's attorney: Brock Ohlson, Justin Corne and Caitlin Lorell. Defendant's attorney: Diana Clineand Teresa Beck.

When was M.I.A.W. v. Greyhound Lines, Inc. decided?

This case was decided on June 23, 2025.