Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Cynthia Bongtar Lukong v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Service

Date: 08-24-2023

Case Number: 8:23-cv-00697-GLS

Judge: Gina L Simms

Court: United States District Court for the District of Maryland (Prince George's County)

Plaintiff's Attorney: Ben Messer

Defendant's Attorney: Alan Carl Lazerow

Description:
Greenbelt, Maryland immigration law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants seeking a writ of mandamus.



A writ of mandamus is a court order that commands a public official or lower court to perform a certain act. The writ is an extraordinary remedy, which means that it is only used in limited circumstances.



To be granted a writ of mandamus, the petitioner must show that:



The petitioner has a legal right to the relief requested.

The respondent has a clear duty to perform the act that is being requested.

The respondent is refusing to perform the act without a valid reason.

The petitioner has no other adequate remedy available.



Writs of mandamus are often used to compel government agencies to follow the law. For example, a writ of mandamus could be used to compel a government agency to issue a permit that it has been delaying or denying.



Writs of mandamus can also be used to compel lower courts to follow the law. For example, a writ of mandamus could be used to compel a lower court to issue a ruling on a case that it has been delaying.



Writs of mandamus are a powerful tool that can be used to ensure that the law is followed. However, they are also a limited remedy that should only be used in the most appropriate cases.



Here are some examples of when a writ of mandamus might be used:



To compel a government agency to issue a permit.

To compel a government agency to comply with a court order.

To compel a lower court to rule on a case.

To compel a public official to perform their duties.



If you believe that you have a right to a writ of mandamus, you should consult with an attorney. An attorney can help you assess your case and determine whether a writ of mandamus is the right remedy for you.
Outcome:
08/24/2023 13 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Cynthia Bongtar Lukong (Messer, Benjamin) (Entered: 08/24/2023)

08/24/2023 14 MARGINAL ORDER approving 13 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Cynthia Bongtar Lukong. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gina L Simms on 8/24/2023. (dass, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 08/24/2023)
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of Cynthia Bongtar Lukong v. United States Citizenship and I...?

The outcome was: 08/24/2023 13 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Cynthia Bongtar Lukong (Messer, Benjamin) (Entered: 08/24/2023) 08/24/2023 14 MARGINAL ORDER approving 13 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Cynthia Bongtar Lukong. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gina L Simms on 8/24/2023. (dass, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 08/24/2023)

Which court heard Cynthia Bongtar Lukong v. United States Citizenship and I...?

This case was heard in United States District Court for the District of Maryland (Prince George's County), MD. The presiding judge was Gina L Simms.

Who were the attorneys in Cynthia Bongtar Lukong v. United States Citizenship and I...?

Plaintiff's attorney: Ben Messer. Defendant's attorney: Alan Carl Lazerow.

When was Cynthia Bongtar Lukong v. United States Citizenship and I... decided?

This case was decided on August 24, 2023.