Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

William J. Moyle v. Roger T. Clark, et al.

Date: 02-03-2024

Case Number: 8:12-cv-00434

Judge: Lyle E. Strom

Court: United States District Court for the District of Nebraska (Douglas County)

Plaintiff's Attorney: Joseph P. Culland and Patrick J. Cullan - 402-397-7600

Defendant's Attorney: Omaha, Nebraska insurance defense lawyer represented the Defendant.

Description:
Omaha, Nebraska personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.



In Nebraska, the right to compensation is based on the "51% rule.” A plaintiff can still recover partial compensation so long as their degree of fault is less than that of the defendant(s) in the case. The plaintiff's compensation will be reduced in proportion to their percentage of fault.
Outcome:
03/21/2024 170 RESTRICTED ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. ACCESS TO THE PDF DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO CASE PARTICIPANTS AND THE COURT PURSUANT TO THE E-GOVERNMENT ACT AND FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 5.2(a). (MKR) (Entered: 03/21/2024)
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of William J. Moyle v. Roger T. Clark, et al.?

The outcome was: 03/21/2024 170 RESTRICTED ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. ACCESS TO THE PDF DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO CASE PARTICIPANTS AND THE COURT PURSUANT TO THE E-GOVERNMENT ACT AND FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 5.2(a). (MKR) (Entered: 03/21/2024)

Which court heard William J. Moyle v. Roger T. Clark, et al.?

This case was heard in United States District Court for the District of Nebraska (Douglas County), NE. The presiding judge was Lyle E. Strom.

Who were the attorneys in William J. Moyle v. Roger T. Clark, et al.?

Plaintiff's attorney: Joseph P. Culland and Patrick J. Cullan - 402-397-7600. Defendant's attorney: Omaha, Nebraska insurance defense lawyer represented the Defendant..

When was William J. Moyle v. Roger T. Clark, et al. decided?

This case was decided on February 3, 2024.