Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Erica Barrett v. O'Reilly Automotive, Inc., et al.

Date: 05-23-2023

Case Number: 6:22-cv-03111

Judge: Brian C. Wimes

Court: United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri (Greene County)

Plaintiff's Attorney:







Click Here For The Best Springfield Employment Law Lawyer Directory







Defendant's Attorney: Charles Britwood Cowherd, James R Carroll, Mary E Grinman, Michael S Hines, W. Joseph Hatley

Description:
Springfield, Missouri employment law lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendants on an E.R.I.S.A. law wrongful denial of employee benefits theory.

The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) is a federal law that sets minimum standards for most voluntarily established retirement and health plans in private industry to provide protection for individuals in these plans.



ERISA requires plans to provide participants with plan information including important information about plan features and funding; sets minimum standards for participation, vesting, benefit accrual and funding; provides fiduciary responsibilities for those who manage and control plan assets; requires plans to establish a grievance and appeals process for participants to get benefits from their plans; gives participants the right to sue for benefits and breaches of fiduciary duty; and, if a defined benefit plan is terminated, guarantees payment of certain benefits through a federally chartered corporation, known as the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC).



In general, ERISA does not cover plans established or maintained by governmental entities, churches for their employees, or plans which are maintained solely to comply with applicable workers compensation, unemployment or disability laws. ERISA also does not cover plans maintained outside the United States primarily for the benefit of nonresident aliens or unfunded excess benefit plans."



US Department of Labor
Outcome:
Judgment in favor of Defendants.



06/21/2023 72 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to 70 Clerk's Judgment by Erica

Barrett, Connie Enderle, Edward Q Ingerson, II, Penny Kenoyer, Gilbert Ontiveros, Kathleen Vincent. Filing fee $ 505, receipt number AMOWDC-8508341. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 - Judgment in a Civil Cse - Granting Motion to Dismiss)(Gyandoh, Mark) (Entered: 06/21/2023)
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of Erica Barrett v. O'Reilly Automotive, Inc., et al.?

The outcome was: Judgment in favor of Defendants. 06/21/2023 72 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to 70 Clerk's Judgment by Erica Barrett, Connie Enderle, Edward Q Ingerson, II, Penny Kenoyer, Gilbert Ontiveros, Kathleen Vincent. Filing fee $ 505, receipt number AMOWDC-8508341. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 - Judgment in a Civil Cse - Granting Motion to Dismiss)(Gyandoh, Mark) (Entered: 06/21/2023)

Which court heard Erica Barrett v. O'Reilly Automotive, Inc., et al.?

This case was heard in United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri (Greene County), CA. The presiding judge was Brian C. Wimes.

Who were the attorneys in Erica Barrett v. O'Reilly Automotive, Inc., et al.?

Plaintiff's attorney: Click Here For The Best Springfield Employment Law Lawyer Directory. Defendant's attorney: Charles Britwood Cowherd, James R Carroll, Mary E Grinman, Michael S Hines, W. Joseph Hatley.

When was Erica Barrett v. O'Reilly Automotive, Inc., et al. decided?

This case was decided on May 23, 2023.