Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

A.R.S. v. Socials Security Administration

Date: 09-08-2023

Case Number: 6:22-cv-02016

Judge: Mark A. Roberts

Court: United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa (Black Hawk County)

Plaintiff's Attorney:

Click Here For The Best Waterloo Social Security Disability Lawyer Directory

Defendant's Attorney: Brandon J. Gray, Chris Carillo, and Emily Carroll

Description:

Waterloo, Iowa social security disability lawyer represented the Plaintiff seeking review of the denial of her application for Social Security: DIWC/DIWW benefits by HHS.

Outcome:

09/08/2023 21 ORDER. The decision of the ALJ is affirmed. Claimant's Complaint is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark A Roberts on 9/8/2023. (jag) (Entered: 09/08/2023)

09/08/2023 22 JUDGMENT in favor of Commissioner of Social Security against Angela Rae Schweitzer.

Plaintiff's Experts:

Defendant's Experts:

Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of A.R.S. v. Socials Security Administration?

The outcome was: 09/08/2023 21 ORDER. The decision of the ALJ is affirmed. Claimant's Complaint is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark A Roberts on 9/8/2023. (jag) (Entered: 09/08/2023) 09/08/2023 22 JUDGMENT in favor of Commissioner of Social Security against Angela Rae Schweitzer.

Which court heard A.R.S. v. Socials Security Administration?

This case was heard in United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa (Black Hawk County), IA. The presiding judge was Mark A. Roberts.

Who were the attorneys in A.R.S. v. Socials Security Administration?

Plaintiff's attorney: Click Here For The Best Waterloo Social Security Disability Lawyer Directory. Defendant's attorney: Brandon J. Gray, Chris Carillo, and Emily Carroll.

When was A.R.S. v. Socials Security Administration decided?

This case was decided on September 8, 2023.