Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Tyler Wallace v. Progressive Direct Insurance Company

Date: 01-05-2024

Case Number: 5:23-cv-00133

Judge: Benjamin Beaton

Court: United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky (McCracken County)

Plaintiff's Attorney:





Click Here For The Best Paducah Personal Injury Insurance Law Lawyer Directory







Defendant's Attorney: Paducah, Kentucky insurance defense lawyer represented the Defendant.

Description:
Paducah, Kentucky personal injury insurance law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a bad faith breach of insurance contract theory.
Outcome:
Based on Wallace's stipulation that his damages do not exceed the jurisdictional amount for federal court, DN 7 , and Progressive's acceptance of that stipulation, DN 8 , the Court grants Wallace's motion for remand, DN 6 , as unopposed and remands this case to McCracken Circuit Court.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of Tyler Wallace v. Progressive Direct Insurance Company?

The outcome was: Based on Wallace's stipulation that his damages do not exceed the jurisdictional amount for federal court, DN 7 , and Progressive's acceptance of that stipulation, DN 8 , the Court grants Wallace's motion for remand, DN 6 , as unopposed and remands this case to McCracken Circuit Court.

Which court heard Tyler Wallace v. Progressive Direct Insurance Company?

This case was heard in United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky (McCracken County), KY. The presiding judge was Benjamin Beaton.

Who were the attorneys in Tyler Wallace v. Progressive Direct Insurance Company?

Plaintiff's attorney: Click Here For The Best Paducah Personal Injury Insurance Law Lawyer Directory. Defendant's attorney: Paducah, Kentucky insurance defense lawyer represented the Defendant..

When was Tyler Wallace v. Progressive Direct Insurance Company decided?

This case was decided on January 5, 2024.