Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
United States of America v. J.T. Myore
Date: 06-27-2025
Case Number: 5:21-cr-50108
Judge: Roberto Lange
Court: United States District Court for the District of South Dakota
Plaintiff's Attorney: United States District Attorney's Office in Rapid City
Defendant's Attorney:
Click Here For The Best Rapid City Criminal Defense Law Lawyer Directory
* * *
Federal robbery and aiding and abetting laws, as defined under 18 U.S.C. § 2, hold individuals liable for the crimes of others if they assist in or encourage the commission of a federal offense. Essentially, anyone who aids, abets, counsels, commands, induces or procures the commission of a federal crime is punishable as a principal offender. This means an aider and abettor faces the same penalties as the person who directly committed the robbery.
Elements of Aiding and Abetting:
To be convicted of aiding and abetting a federal crime, the prosecution must prove:
1. The commission of an underlying federal offense:
.
This means the primary offender committed a crime that violates a federal statute.
2. The defendant's knowledge of the offense:
.
The defendant must have known about the primary offense and its illegal nature.
3. The defendant's intent to facilitate the crime:
.
The defendant must have intended to assist, encourage, or participate in the commission of the offense.
4. The defendant's actions or inactions that further the offense:
.
This can include providing assistance, encouragement, or even failing to act when there's a duty to prevent the crime.
Aiding and Abetting in the Context of Robbery:
In the case of robbery, which often involves taking property from another person by force or threat of force, aiding and abetting could involve actions like:
Driving a getaway car: Providing transportation to the robber after the crime.
Providing information or tools: Supplying the robber with knowledge or equipment that facilitates the robbery.
Serving as a lookout: Alerting the robber to the presence of potential victims or law enforcement.
Encouraging the robbery: Verbally or through actions, urging the robber to commit the crime.
Important Considerations:
Principal Liability:
.
Aiding and abetting is not a separate crime, but rather an alternative means of incurring criminal liability for the underlying offense.
No Requirement to be a Principal:
.
The person who actually committed the robbery does not need to be identified or convicted for an aider and abettor to be held liable.
Withdrawal Defense:
.
In some cases, a defendant may have a defense if they effectively withdrew from the criminal venture before the crime was completed.
Accessory After the Fact:
.
Assisting a criminal after the crime has been completed is typically considered a separate offense, such as being an accessory after the fact, and may carry a lesser penalty than aiding and abetting.
White Collar Crimes:
.
Aiding and abetting charges are frequently seen in cases involving financial fraud and other white-collar crimes.
Count 2: 60 months imprisonment to be consecutive to Count 6s, with 120 months concurrent and 24 months consecutive to the sentence imposed in 5:21-cr-50130; 3 years Supervised Release to run concurrently; $2,100.00 restitution; $100 Special Assessment; forfeiture of items.
County 3: 84 months imprisonment to be consecutive to Count 5s, with 120 months concurrent and 24 months consecutive to the sentence imposed in 5:21-cr-50130; 5 years Supervised Release to run concurrently; $2,100.00 restitution; $100 Special Assessment; forfeiture of items.
About This Case
What was the outcome of United States of America v. J.T. Myore?
The outcome was: Count 1: 132 months imprisonment of which 120 months is to be served concurrent and 12 months to be served consecutive to the sentence imposed in 5:21-cr-50130; 3 years Supervised Release to run concurrently; $2,100.00 restitution; $100 Special Assessment/ Count 2: 60 months imprisonment to be consecutive to Count 6s, with 120 months concurrent and 24 months consecutive to the sentence imposed in 5:21-cr-50130; 3 years Supervised Release to run concurrently; $2,100.00 restitution; $100 Special Assessment; forfeiture of items. County 3: 84 months imprisonment to be consecutive to Count 5s, with 120 months concurrent and 24 months consecutive to the sentence imposed in 5:21-cr-50130; 5 years Supervised Release to run concurrently; $2,100.00 restitution; $100 Special Assessment; forfeiture of items.
Which court heard United States of America v. J.T. Myore?
This case was heard in United States District Court for the District of South Dakota, SD. The presiding judge was Roberto Lange.
Who were the attorneys in United States of America v. J.T. Myore?
Plaintiff's attorney: United States District Attorney's Office in Rapid City. Defendant's attorney: Click Here For The Best Rapid City Criminal Defense Law Lawyer Directory.
When was United States of America v. J.T. Myore decided?
This case was decided on June 27, 2025.