Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Tony E. Rardon v. Falcon Safety Products, Inc., et al.

Date: 02-09-2024

Case Number: 5:20-cv-06165

Judge: Beth Phillips

Court: United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri (Buchanan County)

Plaintiff's Attorney:





Click Here For The Best St. Joseph Personal Injury Lawyer Directory







Defendant's Attorney: St. Joseph, Missouri insurance defense lawyers represented the Defendants.

Description:
St. Joseph, Missouri personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a product liability theory.



Falcon Safety Products, Inc. is a family-owned company and the leading manufacturer and marketer of compressed-gas dusters and signal horns,...



Missouri law provides that a person injured by a defective or unsafe condition of a product or due to negligence in the design, manufacture, sale, or distribution of a product has 15 years after the sale or lease of the product to bring a claim for damages. See: https://www.senate.mo.gov/22info/BTS_Web/Bill.aspx?SessionType=R&BillID=77307108
Outcome:
Settled for an undisclosed sum and dismissed with prejudice.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of Tony E. Rardon v. Falcon Safety Products, Inc., et al.?

The outcome was: Settled for an undisclosed sum and dismissed with prejudice.

Which court heard Tony E. Rardon v. Falcon Safety Products, Inc., et al.?

This case was heard in United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri (Buchanan County), MO. The presiding judge was Beth Phillips.

Who were the attorneys in Tony E. Rardon v. Falcon Safety Products, Inc., et al.?

Plaintiff's attorney: Click Here For The Best St. Joseph Personal Injury Lawyer Directory. Defendant's attorney: St. Joseph, Missouri insurance defense lawyers represented the Defendants..

When was Tony E. Rardon v. Falcon Safety Products, Inc., et al. decided?

This case was decided on February 9, 2024.