Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Sara Underwood, et al. v. KAB Business Holdings, Inc., et al.

Date: 04-30-2021

Case Number: 5:20-cv-00881-JDW

Judge: Joshua D. Wolson

Court: United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (Lehigh County)

Plaintiff's Attorney:



Tradmark Lawyer Directory



Defendant's Attorney: William B. Morrin

Description:
Allentown, Pennsylvania intellectual property lawyer represented Plaintiffs, who sue the Defendants on trademark infringement theories.
Outcome:
04/30/2021 48 ORDERED THAT JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN THIS ACTION IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFFS AND AGAINST DEFENDANT FOR ALL CLAIMS THEY HAVE ALLEGED IN THE COMPLAINT, IN THE AMOUNT OF EIGHTY THOUSAND DOLLARS ($80,000.00), PLUS POST-JUDGMENT INTEREST BEGINNING ON THE DATE THIS JUDGMENT IS ENTERED UNTIL FINAL PAYMENT. B. PLAINTIFFS SHALL NOT ASSIGN OR, UPON THE KAB COVENANT BECOMING EFFECTIVE, EXECUTE, OR OTHERWISE ATTEMPT IN ANY MANNER TO COLLECT ON THE STIPULATED JUDGMENT EXCEPT AS TO DEFENDANTS ASSETS CONSISTING OF ANY AND ALL RIGHT, TITLE AND INTEREST IN THE NORTH AMERICAN POLICY TOGETHER WITH ALL OF THEIR RESPECTIVE RIGHTS, CLAIMS, AND CAUSES OF ACTION IN THE ASSIGNED CLAIMS. C. UPON THE ASSIGNMENT OF THE ASSIGNED CLAIMS TO PLAINTIFF BY DEFENDANT, THE KAB COVENANT SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE JOSHUA D. WOLSON ON 4/29/21. 4/30/21 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(jaa, ) Modified on 4/30/2021 (jaa, ). *NOT MAILED TO UNREP. (Entered: 04/30/2021)

04/30/2021 49 (FILED IN ERROR AS A DUPLICATE. SEE DOC. NO. 48 ) ORDER THAT JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN THIS ACTION IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFFS AND AGAINST DEFENDANT FOR ALL CLAIMS THEY HAVE ALLEGED IN THE COMPLAINT, IN THE AMOUNT OF $80,000.00 AS OUTLINED HEREIN. SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE JOSHUA D. WOLSON ON 4/29/21. 5/3/21 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas, ) Modified on 5/3/2021 (amas, ). (Main Document 49 replaced on 5/3/2021) (amas, ). (Entered: 05/03/2021)
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of Sara Underwood, et al. v. KAB Business Holdings, Inc., et...?

The outcome was: 04/30/2021 48 ORDERED THAT JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN THIS ACTION IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFFS AND AGAINST DEFENDANT FOR ALL CLAIMS THEY HAVE ALLEGED IN THE COMPLAINT, IN THE AMOUNT OF EIGHTY THOUSAND DOLLARS ($80,000.00), PLUS POST-JUDGMENT INTEREST BEGINNING ON THE DATE THIS JUDGMENT IS ENTERED UNTIL FINAL PAYMENT. B. PLAINTIFFS SHALL NOT ASSIGN OR, UPON THE KAB COVENANT BECOMING EFFECTIVE, EXECUTE, OR OTHERWISE ATTEMPT IN ANY MANNER TO COLLECT ON THE STIPULATED JUDGMENT EXCEPT AS TO DEFENDANTS ASSETS CONSISTING OF ANY AND ALL RIGHT, TITLE AND INTEREST IN THE NORTH AMERICAN POLICY TOGETHER WITH ALL OF THEIR RESPECTIVE RIGHTS, CLAIMS, AND CAUSES OF ACTION IN THE ASSIGNED CLAIMS. C. UPON THE ASSIGNMENT OF THE ASSIGNED CLAIMS TO PLAINTIFF BY DEFENDANT, THE KAB COVENANT SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE JOSHUA D. WOLSON ON 4/29/21. 4/30/21 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(jaa, ) Modified on 4/30/2021 (jaa, ). *NOT MAILED TO UNREP. (Entered: 04/30/2021) 04/30/2021 49 (FILED IN ERROR AS A DUPLICATE. SEE DOC. NO. 48 ) ORDER THAT JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN THIS ACTION IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFFS AND AGAINST DEFENDANT FOR ALL CLAIMS THEY HAVE ALLEGED IN THE COMPLAINT, IN THE AMOUNT OF $80,000.00 AS OUTLINED HEREIN. SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE JOSHUA D. WOLSON ON 4/29/21. 5/3/21 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas, ) Modified on 5/3/2021 (amas, ). (Main Document 49 replaced on 5/3/2021) (amas, ). (Entered: 05/03/2021)

Which court heard Sara Underwood, et al. v. KAB Business Holdings, Inc., et...?

This case was heard in United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (Lehigh County), PA. The presiding judge was Joshua D. Wolson.

Who were the attorneys in Sara Underwood, et al. v. KAB Business Holdings, Inc., et...?

Plaintiff's attorney: Tradmark Lawyer Directory. Defendant's attorney: William B. Morrin.

When was Sara Underwood, et al. v. KAB Business Holdings, Inc., et... decided?

This case was decided on April 30, 2021.