Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Christine Gendron v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration Morelaw Internet Marketing for Legal Professionals Helping People Find You On The Internet 888-354-4529

Date: 05-24-2018

Case Number: 5:17-cv-00428-BO

Judge: Terrence W. Boyle

Court: United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina (Pitt County)

Plaintiff's Attorney: Kristin Oakley

Defendant's Attorney: Gabriel R. Deadwyler and Mark J. Goldenberg

Description:
Greenville, NC - Christine Gendron sued the Commissioner, Social Security Administration seeking review of the denial of her application for SSID benefits by HHS.
Outcome:
05/24/2018 24 Minute Entry for proceedings held in Elizabeth City before US District Judge Terrence W. Boyle: Motion Hearing held on 5/24/2018. All parties present and ready to proceed. Oral argument held. ORAL ORDER granting plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings and denying defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings. (Court Reporter Sandra Graham) (Stouch, L.) (Entered: 05/29/2018)

05/24/2018 ORAL ORDER granting 16 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings and denying 20 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Entered by US District Judge Terrence W. Boyle on 5/24/2018. (Stouch, L.) (Entered: 05/29/2018)

05/24/2018 25 JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the record does not adequately deal with whether plaintiff can preform more than sedentary work. The finding that she has an RFC of light work and the finding at Step Four, that she can go back and preform past relevant work, needs to be re-examined. The decision is remanded. Upon remand, the Social Security Administration should review whether or not she has an RFC greater than sedentary and examine how the prior two decisions fit into the RFC. Signed by deputy clerk for Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 5/24/2018. (Stouch, L.) (Entered: 05/29/2018)
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of Christine Gendron v. Commissioner, Social Security Admini...?

The outcome was: 05/24/2018 24 Minute Entry for proceedings held in Elizabeth City before US District Judge Terrence W. Boyle: Motion Hearing held on 5/24/2018. All parties present and ready to proceed. Oral argument held. ORAL ORDER granting plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings and denying defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings. (Court Reporter Sandra Graham) (Stouch, L.) (Entered: 05/29/2018) 05/24/2018 ORAL ORDER granting 16 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings and denying 20 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Entered by US District Judge Terrence W. Boyle on 5/24/2018. (Stouch, L.) (Entered: 05/29/2018) 05/24/2018 25 JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the record does not adequately deal with whether plaintiff can preform more than sedentary work. The finding that she has an RFC of light work and the finding at Step Four, that she can go back and preform past relevant work, needs to be re-examined. The decision is remanded. Upon remand, the Social Security Administration should review whether or not she has an RFC greater than sedentary and examine how the prior two decisions fit into the RFC. Signed by deputy clerk for Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 5/24/2018. (Stouch, L.) (Entered: 05/29/2018)

Which court heard Christine Gendron v. Commissioner, Social Security Admini...?

This case was heard in United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina (Pitt County), NC. The presiding judge was Terrence W. Boyle.

Who were the attorneys in Christine Gendron v. Commissioner, Social Security Admini...?

Plaintiff's attorney: Kristin Oakley. Defendant's attorney: Gabriel R. Deadwyler and Mark J. Goldenberg.

When was Christine Gendron v. Commissioner, Social Security Admini... decided?

This case was decided on May 24, 2018.